Dungeons & Dragons Announces Arcana Unleashed, New Magic-Themed Sourcebook at $49.99 Price Point

[WanderingMystic]

What are the 8 runes on the alternate cover? And I also note on the cover of Arcana Unleashed Deadfall alternate cover, around the skull thing are 8 circles, 4 of which are filled in. Which makes me think there'll be some fetch quests to get doo-hickeys or perform actions that align to the 8 circles of magic.

They are the schools of magic

 

[Eyes of Nine]

They are the schools of magic

Yes that sounds like a good guess. Which rune aligns with which school? I thought necromancy would be easy, but after looking, none/all seem like a good fit for necro.

 

[Scribe]

Yes that sounds like a good guess. Which rune aligns with which school? I thought necromancy would be easy, but after looking, none/all seem like a good fit for necro.

The one repeated on the skulls/heads of the bad guys I would assume.

 

[mcmillan]

I don't remember if they show up in books, but dndbeyond uses some of the runes as icons for the spell list. Looks like the top horn rune is abjuration, clockwise from that is conjuration, don't know next, then evocation, kind of like necromancy, looks a bit like an eye like illusion, then last two don't quite match. So we have three that don't fit and are missing divination, transmutation and enchantment

 

[Li Shenron]

While I am happy about the focus still being on adventures and settings (Ravenloft + Dark Sun), this other book gives me a sense of deja-vu... we're now getting into "revision rehash" territory pretty much like it happened more than 20 years ago with 3.5 and "splatbooks" which included a little new material but mostly just "revised" versions of older stuff that didn't really need a revision, but now need an adaptation to stuff that was also unnecessarily changed in 2024 (such as subclass starting levels). Players now "need" to buy another book to choose subclasses or spells that were already there. Some truly new options will be there for sure, but given the recent level of creativity by WotC you can bet they will mostly be about extra damage, extra healing, or advantage. Don't be fooled by the "high magic" tag, it's just a marketing ploy, there won't be any high magic module or system, "high" here just means that most of of the book is about magic, but it is the same kind as always.

 

[Seramus]

Or else what people have long been saying about the UA's not really being for design any longer, but merely to showcase what WotC is doing, is true.

I have long said that the window for feedback on UA is WAY too short for any real playtest. Most players would only get a single game in!

 

[Reynard]

While I am happy about the focus still being on adventures and settings (Ravenloft + Dark Sun), this other book gives me a sense of deja-vu... we're now getting into "revision rehash" territory pretty much like it happened more than 20 years ago with 3.5 and "splatbooks" which included a little new material but mostly just "revised" versions of older stuff that didn't really need a revision, but now need an adaptation to stuff that was also unnecessarily changed in 2024 (such as subclass starting levels). Players now "need" to buy another book to choose subclasses or spells that were already there. Some truly new options will be there for sure, but given the recent level of creativity by WotC you can bet they will mostly be about extra damage, extra healing, or advantage. Don't be fooled by the "high magic" tag, it's just a marketing ploy, there won't be any high magic module or system, "high" here just means that most of of the book is about magic, but it is the same kind as always.

But it is compatible! But it isn't a new edition!

 

[Li Shenron]

But it is compatible! But it isn't a new edition!

As I said, deja-vu... People have already begged WotC to release the "missing wizard schools subclasses" since the 2024 PHB. Could they not have used the 2014 PHB subclasses?

 

[GarrettKP]

As I said, deja-vu... People have already begged WotC to release the "missing wizard schools subclasses" since the 2024 PHB. Could they not have used the 2014 PHB subclasses?

They could have. But with how improved some of the 5.5 versions are, it’s fair to assume people want the same treatment for their favorite subclasses. Necromancer comes to mind especially.

 

[bedir than]

But it is compatible! But it isn't a new edition!

It's funny that the mocking of compatibility is part of why they have to re-release things.
Answering the prattle requires confirmation of the false claim of incompatibility.