Charlaquin
Goblin Queen (She/Her/Hers)
The crying scene. So, so much snot.I saw it in the theatre when it came out. Maybe it was the shaky camera, but I don't remember anything being gross
The crying scene. So, so much snot.I saw it in the theatre when it came out. Maybe it was the shaky camera, but I don't remember anything being gross
Well, not exactly. But I can understand why he might be less sexually appealing to folks who are not into men. Cthulhu has a pretty distinct masculine energy, and you kinda gotta be up for finding out what them tentacles do.Cthulhu is not a man, or did I misunderstand your response.
Love triangle with Tatyana.My nerd-nitpicking aside - what is Cthulhu doin the Strahd book anyways lol?
According to the portion of text that is visible, this Cthulhu is not a prisoner. Every time you adapt a literary character, you create a new version of that character. There are lots of different Draculas, lots of different Frankensteins, lots of different Sherlock Holmes, and not quite as many different Cthulhus. The Cthulhu in D&D isn't the same as the Cthulhu in Call of Cthulhu, isn't the same as the Cthulhu in Underwater, etc. And since the character is fictional there is no true version of that character.Cthulhu: likely a weakened or chained version (confirmed)
This isn't a Mythos book. It includes some mythos creatures to accompany one new domain - presumably R'lyeh. It will no doubt have several other new domains, featuring different horror subgenres*. It's not going to include the entire pantheon of Elder Gods, just the one mentioned in the PHB, and the useful monsters.Azathoth as a Lord of Dread, along with some mentions of the Cult of Azathoth--possibly using Cthulhu as an envoy {in the Mythos, Cthulhu is considered a priest of Azathoth} (unconfirmed)
Cthulhu should never have stats imo.
Kinda goes against the point!
I don’t mind stats on Cthulhu. Azathoth shouldn’t have stats though.
Since this seems pretty clearly similar to Forge of the Artificer, I reckon there will be Campaign Frames and Bastions. Wouldn't surprise me if there were some Mythos material in there, and more than just the Hithians and Cthulu. I would think at least the MM approach of having Mythos opponents to insert at any gameplay Tier.According to the portion of text that is visible, this Cthulhu is not a prisoner. Every time you adapt a literary character, you create a new version of that character. There are lots of different Draculas, lots of different Frankensteins, lots of different Sherlock Holmes, and not quite as many different Cthulhus. The Cthulhu in D&D isn't the same as the Cthulhu in Call of Cthulhu, isn't the same as the Cthulhu in Underwater, etc. And since the character is fictional there is no true version of that character.
Some people tend to treat the original version of a character with greater reverence than any adaptation, but in this case, there is no reverence for HPL. As pointed out elsewhere, this author is well and truly dead, leaving people feeling free to do whatever they like with his characters.
This isn't a Mythos book. It includes some mythos creatures to accompany one new domain - presumably R'lyeh. It will no doubt have several other new domains, featuring different horror subgenres*. It's not going to include the entire pantheon of Elder Gods, just the one mentioned in the PHB, and the useful monsters.
Note, Bluetspur is basically an X-Files domain, not a mythos domain, and was described in VGR. It's unlikely to be revisited in this new book.
*I would guess things that haven't really been done much previously - a Stephen King domain and a Slasher domain perhaps.
Rumours that Winnie the Pooh is the dark lord are greatly exaggerated - or are they....
We don't see much of the block, and I'm sure it has some eldritch surprises.

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.