Recent content by 0000000000

Since this will most likely be my last post. I wish you all the best. A picture is worth a 1000 words. Know at least that I acted in all good faith.

They seem a bit base in comparison. A great deal of thought went into my system. I see some effort to stream line things and 2 common denominators, other than that they are worlds apart

I am making no attempt to make things up, nor am I lying. My post was moved as we can see here. I am not trying to be combative, but you are falsely accusing me of things that actually happened. It seems you are indeed hell bent on misrepresenting me and I will accept in truth what your motives...

These all seem like valid or well known systems. I would like to know better what you are getting at?

Yes I also saw that as a concern,. I have done my best to make such rules streamline and often will offer the stream lined version for those who are less a fan of crunchy and prefer speed. Good news, the book goes on to be more specific, but to summarize it is for good role playing, good...

I am not so sure when someone kinda comes at me, they are doing so to become, potential customers. But I understand your point and will keep it in mind going forward. Yes I agree with your edit, but I have found a forum that seems open to hearing ideas. Agreability may be nice, but constructive...

I can. My system takes a slightly different approach to gaming. The GM has a lot of say in how things play out. I notice a lot of systems persistently have , house rules so I designed my system so that GM could pick and choose which rules are to be used within a specific campaign. Players add to...

I am not sure what that would it achieve? Is that something you do? As I have yet to reveal my game in a meaningful way here, I think the advice to find a different forum that offers constructive criticism is good advice. As I have stated in the past the voices of those who have never tried my...

The difference is, I do believe it is a moral issue. For the same reason plagiarism is frowned upon. I do believe that ideas are being circulated without benefit to the original creator. It is not a legal requirement for me to hold a door for someone, but regardless, I choose to do so anyway...

I believe we are beating a dead horse here. It isn't about if it is legal, it is about whether or not it is moral when you ,( not you personally), do so and whether or not AI does it. If it is wrong when AI does so, then it begs to question, legal or not, why is it moral when you do so?

There is a difference between copyright, and registered copyright. Normal copyright is granted to a creator when they create something. Registered copyright is a way of protecting your work should someone else claim they invented something prior to you. It grants a far better case in court...

I highly suspect that those data centers serve an alternate purpose, henceforth why they are building soo many.

I think it fair to say that my grasp on copyright is quite clear. I have researched, filed and successfully acquired copyright in 2 countries. I have differentiated that I understand mechanics/ideas are not copyright material. As you say there is a difference between Moral ethical and legal. Of...

I agree that now that is the case. So many people are against it though, I am not so sure they can maintain profits with soo many people against the service. Though entertainment and research may not be the only use for ai and it will get implemented regardless

You may be correct. I am new to forums and this particular scene. The sharing of mechanics is a totally new and somewhat strange practice to me. Though after my research it seems to be normalized. I will point out the technical term for this is derivative works. When concerning subject matters...