Recent content by AcererakTriple6

I agree. Sure, they can get Expertise, but as long as they're a non-human/half-human, they're not going to get anything more than just one Expertise proficiency. For Rangers taking this feat, they're probably going to take Stealth or Survival, or possibly Perception. A rogue is much less limited...

I mean, yeah, Rangers are great in that UA, and I hope they keep those changes. Rogues didn't really need any fixes from that UA, and gain access to a ton of stuff they didn't have easy access to beforehand from this UA.

Okay, calm down a bit. @doctorbadwolf was referring to Expertise, from Practiced Expert.

Especially with those "Race Feature Variants" they mentioned in that announcement awhile ago. It looks like this book will add a lot of much needed player customizability.

9/10 times, Eldritch Blast. (I'm assuming you were alluding to this). I think the feat is plenty strong as is, we don't need to give them another way to grab eldritch blast.

I think the Channel Divinity feat as a possibility would be cool, but I wouldn't be surprised if for simplicity they limited it to people who already have Channel Divinity, and simply gave them another use of it. I'm sad to see Gunner and Artificer Initiate score so low, those were 2 of my...

I wasn't complaining, I was just stating a fact. I honestly don't care if rogues are better than rangers because of this, or if WotC designed a feat in this UA called "Screw Rangers" and took the spellcasting progression and spells from the ranger class and gave it to whoever takes this feat...

They seem to be exactly that. They're not getting rid of multiclassing, as quite a few people like it, but they're adding this for people who don't mind giving an ASI to be a bit like multiclassing.

That sucks. I'm lucky, I don't have to go work during the pandemic. But they can't get it on the same level that rogues can, especially scout rogues. Also, the rogue is benefitted more from this feat than the ranger, as the ranger already had access to hunter's mark, a fighting style, shields...

Okay, I'll do it: Okay, I'm assuming you're referring to Practiced Expert now instead of Tracker, sorry for the misunderstanding, but you were unclear. (Sorry you have had a bad day) Yes, they get expertise, in one skill or tool proficiency. Scouts get expertise in Nature and Survival...

So, umm, thanks for dodging the clarification then? What rogue feature do you think rangers can get from this feat? Again, at least two people found your general statement confusing, so please do clarify, because Sneak Attack is not granted, Expertise is not granted by this feat, and neither are...

You didn't state "Things that the rogue has over the ranger at being a ranger" you said "The only thing rogues have over rangers" (please excuse the paraphrasing). Also, it is kind of important, as most ranger subclasses get an ability kind of similar to sneak attack, that is once a turn and...

I was also confused by your statement that "Rangers get the only thing rogues have that they don't already have" and was going to point out sneak attack as well. It's not snarky to point out the flaw in a statement, and this isn't a context problem. Please do explain what you mean.

At level one, not that I know of, but if starting at a later level (like level 3) I know some DMs allow magic items upon character generation.

Cyclopes. They're great monsters, and I originally learned about them from Greek Mythology, but in D&D I have for some reason never felt compelled to put them in a campaign. Maybe it's because they're a bit lacking in flavorful lore, at least in 5e. Morkoths. This is the opposite of Cyclopes...