Recent content by blondbauke

Ok thanks all for your input, the modifiers and stuff were kinda weird to us, so i wanted to ask if we did something wrong, as we kinda did:P

Ah then my math is just wrong:P Good to know, ill tell my DM that, cuz then we just gained like double xp for all 3 fights

Its kinda my problem, when the DM and we just trying to figuring this out together. Before he just let us level up for like 3 sessions and stuff, he just wanted to look if the xp works the same way

They all came one round later then the ones before:S So i call that one encounter, its just that our DM seems to find the ruling a bit funny in the DMG Thats why im asking here.

We have no magic users and no magic items, and still we kill like 3X deadly encounters. The thing what im asking is: is my calculation right or am i doing something wrong? Cuz now our DM just puts an encounter on our way, and we kinda level up each encounter. As i see the table that was made...

But is DND made to survive 2x deadly or even 3x deadly encounters? If im reading the dmg, it states that u should look at the party chars first, and then u have 4 options of encounters. Or is just my math incorrect? were playing a non magic campagne btw, or close to.

In the DMG "Deadly" means, if u dont use ur brain ur party could die:P

we were the ones being ambushed, and some of our party couldnt see well in the dark, so had to go around with a torch. we kinda were at disadventage. we had 2 ppl going below 0 but we could get them alive again, was the last round orso. dont really have any other circumstances:S

In the DMguide, there is a section about XP for non combat encounters tho, altho just rescuing the prisoners without any problems, is kinda just in a works day:P

I think your calculation is correct, i still dont understand why my party (party of level 4, Rogue, Hunter, Fighter and Barbarian) went through 21 orcs and a orc war chief in one encounter. We're playing a non magic campagne, something happened 500 years ago and were trying to find magic back in...