Recent content by BMaC

In my first play-through when I found the portals in Sorcerous Sundries I exclaimed, "Yes...each one will lead to a DLC! Yessss!"

It made money so obviously the answer is to make another one...nevermind that the reason BG3 was so successful is solely down to the work of Larian and arguably occured despite the involvement of WotC. Given the huge success of BG3, we can expect the Hasbro suits will be much more hands-on with...

Uh oh.

Does this Bledsaw guy have a square job?

This is a sadly amoral way to live life.

Why don't you care?

People need to stop buying anything made by WotC.

There's a good chance this is a recent decision based on the reaction to the MM. I get the sense listening to him that Crawford has recently received several thousand dollars worth of media training. He's starting to sound like a corporate shill more and more.

If being "uncool" means less Mercer and 'actual play' content then that's fantastic news.

Counterspell as a reaction is nice. Reaction was an under-used mechanic in 2014 MM.

Did you ask about the use of AI to generate content? If not, why?

I have the 4th edition Forgotten Realms Campaign Guide and it has a great section on pantheons. However, there are no stat blocks for deities. Is there a 4th edition source of stat blocks for deities or was 3rd edition's Faiths and Pantheons the last book to give deity stat blocks?

They need to allow Greyhawk content to be published on DM's Guild. Otherwise the thirty pages here is a wasted opportunity.

Is he ok? What's up with the hat?

They brought in a bunch of mobile and digital game folks. Of course they don't know how to handle physical l, actual table top games. When you are a hammer everything looks like a nail.