Burnside's latest activity

I actually do think they may be missing the boat a bit by not considering a true solo adventure product. They have consistently, for...

Anecdotally, my paladin finished Baldur's Gate: Descent into Avernus at Level 13. His magic items at the end of the campaign: 1...

"The licenses and CC0 cannot be revoked. This means once you apply a CC license to your material, anyone who receives it may rely on...

...in exchange for unlimited candy! Iconic behavior.

Until you read the text, though. That orange lady with the glasses and the candy cane? She is a neutral evil halfling who sold her...

Fair enough. But also, so far, no classic SRDs are in CC. I'm just not giving them credit for stuff until they actually do stuff...

Looks like the average page length of each adventure is 12-14 pages. Longest I think is 20.

This is getting too pedantic. They've made a public, clear, written commitment to release an updated SRD "within weeks" of the new...

I'm reassured by those adventure pages' text. This looks great.

According to the table of contents, that's apparently a gold dragon whelp kept prisoner by a hag in a cabin made out of candy.

I didn't say that "WotC has broken promises to fans". I said that their recent history concerning this exact issue (SRDs) is lousy...

The statement is here...

I do want to say thanks to @Morrus for releasing things under under the Creative Commons, the Open Game License, and the Open RPG...

I'm hoping to see it for that reason. Being able to take the new D&D 2024 monsters they choose to release and have them in other formats...

Not only that, but I think the idea that eliminating the DM would be a "monetizing" move for WotC is bizarre. It would be the opposite...