Charlaquin's latest activity

The problem is, “some action that reveals you” is not fully defined. I mean, we know that attacking, casting a spell with a verbal...

Huh. That’s pretty much exactly how my group runs stealth in pretty much any d20 based game. Since before 4e came out, regardless of the...

Here's what's in the 4e Rules Compendium:

The final version probably ended up in the Essential books - the D&D Rules Compendium (2010), which seems to match the errata from what...

There are many assumptions in the 2024 Stealth rules to trip you up, but one of the actual oversights (and there are several of them in...

This one: It is probably a little too complex to fit 5e’s design aesthetic, especially early 5e, but it serves as a solid starting...

Again, there is no FUNCTIONAL difference between those two things.

Gleemax would have been the move, for sure

Regardless of how rocky the process of getting there was, my point is that they did eventually land on pretty much perfect stealth...

That’s not meaningfully different from being transparent until they search or you reveal yourself. Hence why I’ve been saying...

No, the 2014 version also worked in exactly this way, where if your AC was less than 16 it became 16 and if your AC was 16 or higher it...

Yes, if you read something the text doesn’t say and the developer clarifications counter-indicate, it works just fine!

Not really. 4e did it just fine.

"Invisible" is the worst thing to ever happen to stealth.

It doesn’t make you literally transparent in the narrative, but it does seem to make you functionally transparent, mechanically...