Charlaquin's latest activity

While I don’t an issue with fighting in darkness being a straight roll, I like the emphasis idea. I’m just not sure how it plays out...

Ok, there’s art of a stag 🙄 There’s no art in the book that would tell us if his human form looks like Gandalf or not, was my point...

I specifically don’t want to do that, because it isn’t simple enough for my tastes. Adding a third status that a roll gains if it would...

Mordenkainen doesn’t have art in Curse of Strahd, but as @GarrettKP notes, he is described as having long hair and a long beard, and his...

These two birds could be killed with one stone by ruling that, if the two numbers are equidistant from 10, take the higher result if the...

By… doing it? I’m sorry, I don’t know how else to answer. How do I know if I have both socks and shoes without counting the number of...

That’s how I intend to use it, yes.

The one with the red coat, curly black hair, axe, and sword is unquestionably Ez. The little girl with the lantern hanging from a staff...

I would assume that the better word would have been ‘announcements’ rather than ‘releases’. We know nothing about the upcoming releases

It ends up that way, but you don’t have to count them. Advantage and disadvantage? Switch for emphasis. Emphasis and advantage? Drop...

Correct. I assume so. You could make it furthest from 11 if you wanted to privilege failure.

I think it’s a reasonable proposition and I liked the mechanic when Mulligan brought it out in CR recently. The darkness thing was...

I think my core concern with this idea is that the d20 is already a very swingy die and priviliging the bigger diversion from the median...

Considering that as a default the results of rolls are binary (success/failure), I don't see how this house rule changes the game at...

As usual, I tagged this for 2024, but it applies equally to 2014 and presumably to your 5e-alike of choice, as long as it has advantage...