Charlaquin's latest activity

Three is already enough for an 11th+ level fighter to use for all of their attacks. True in the 2014 rules, but in the revised rules...

The name is definitely terrible. Mechanically, this subclass really doesn’t seem to have anything to do with stealing spells. Rather, it...

Oh look, more martial classes stealing from casters. Stop the madness already WOTC.

Because other characters can attack with them. I think that would be pretty reasonable, but in that case I would have it only affect...

It’s way more damage than any other rogue subclass currently provides at level 3. And I’ve never seen a 5e party that wouldn’t be able...

Yes, because famously rogues are content with the damage that they do presently...

You're not stealing the spells: your surfing on them. And you don't need to even attack the same target: the ally's spell goes off, you...

I agree with these criteria I think this is where we differ. I can see why you would consider my goal unattainable if you consider few...

Using your reaction when your ally casts a spell to add d6s equal to the spell’s level to your next sneak attack (with no negative...

They dont steal at least lvl 3 ability. Its just fluff.

Nothing in the text requires the spells to be cast by enemies

I simply don’t agree that this isn’t an achievable design goal, but there isn’t really anywhere else for that line of discussion to go...

Ok. We clearly have different ideas of what “simple” means.

I disagree. The wizard already doesn’t feel like memorizing complex formula. The bard doesn’t feel like playing music. The monk doesn’t...

Yeah, your reading was how I meant it, but I can see where it could be easily misunderstood.