Recent content by Charlaquin

  1. Charlaquin

    Dungeons & Dragons Playtests Four New Mystic-Themed Subclasses

    And then wait an hour before you can do it again
  2. 1768606638577.gif

    1768606638577.gif

  3. Charlaquin

    Dungeons & Dragons Playtests Four New Mystic-Themed Subclasses

    Well the warlock subclass in question never lets you restore your patron to godhood, so this seems like a moot point. The closest it comes is a “semblance of life” for 1 minute a day.
  4. Charlaquin

    D&D 5E (2024) Mearls has some Interesting Ideals about how to fix high level wizards.

    Yeah, I mean I’m a huge 4e apologist, but I still play 5e over 4e. Each edition has things I prefer over the other, but ultimately 5e wins for me. A more 4e-ish 5e would be great, even if I would be a little bitter they didn’t listen to those of us who were saying so all the way back in 2012...
  5. Charlaquin

    Dungeons & Dragons Playtests Four New Mystic-Themed Subclasses

    There are also some non-spell magical abilities from 2014 that became spells in 2024. For example, the dryad’s Charm ability got turned into the Charm Monster spell, with a parenthetical note saying it lasts 24 hours and ends early if the Dryad casts it again. My impression is that early in the...
  6. Charlaquin

    D&D 5E (2014) Real Emotions at the Gaming Table

    My reaction would depend on a lot of factors, from in-game context to my real-life emotional state on that particular day. I think I tend to lean towards “this will make a great story,” but if the tone of the campaign is super light and goofy, that would likely shift me towards “that’s...
  7. Charlaquin

    Dungeons & Dragons Playtests Four New Mystic-Themed Subclasses

    Yes, I agree. Tell that to @Minigiant
  8. Charlaquin

    Dungeons & Dragons Playtests Four New Mystic-Themed Subclasses

    Who ever said they could go back in the cycle for rebirth? Sure. “A secret, third thing” is just a memetic turn of phrase I was borrowing. My point was not about the exact number of possibilities, but that “outside the cycle of life and death” is categorically distinct from “dead.”
  9. Charlaquin

    Dungeons & Dragons Playtests Four New Mystic-Themed Subclasses

    Being “dead, dead” is part of the cycle of life and death. It’s the death part. If they’re outside the cycle of life and death, they aren’t alive or dead. They’re a secret third thing.
  10. Charlaquin

    Dungeons & Dragons Playtests Four New Mystic-Themed Subclasses

    Interesting; Teneborous is also one of the Amber Vestiges in Curse of Strahd. There is, actually, as of 5e Van Richten’s Guide to Ravenloft. It still exists, but without a Dark Lord it’s literally falling apart. Large portions of its map have been swallowed up by the mists, and the implication...
  11. Charlaquin

    Dungeons & Dragons Playtests Four New Mystic-Themed Subclasses

    Also, the term Vestige already has a specific meaning within 5e canon. The entities trapped inside the amber sarcophagi in Curse of Strahd and Van Richten’s guide are Vestiges. They’re depicted as remnants of “dead” gods, but in this case them being “dead” mostly means they have gone dormant...
  12. Charlaquin

    Dungeons & Dragons Playtests Four New Mystic-Themed Subclasses

    New headcanon: the OC depicted is a Binder, who Bound the Vestige of actual Thomas Jefferson
  13. Charlaquin

    Dungeons & Dragons Playtests Four New Mystic-Themed Subclasses

    I’m having trouble reconciling these two statements about Vestiges. Aren’t all of these examples of Vestiges alive? Any Binder stans able to help clarify this for me?
Top