Clint_L's latest activity

I think WotC has made it fairly obvious that they want an evergreen D&D product that they can iterate and revise upon, and I think the...

We only watched the first two seasons of Discovery, and are lukewarm on this series, and I'm trying to put my finger why this new...

The subscription fees for DndBeyond are also a major difference. Pre-5e editions had a similar arc after the 80s when the game was still...

I dislike the term "slop" because I feel that it inherently denigrates those who are fine with it. It comes off as elitist. For...

It's not tricky at all. WotC have a working system for that: legacy content. They stop selling the books on DDB, but maintain supprt for...

But that won't ever happen. They're the behemoth; as soon as they do something, it isn't novelty, and the same folks who complain about...

Yeah, I agree, I think D&D simply isn't in any kind of position where it needs to change because of any other product or perceived...

I'm also curious why anyone would want radical change to the current system. It's obviously working well for a huge number of people, if...

Any day now...

I should have been clearer: I am not talking about what DDB can handle mechanically, I'm talking about DDB in its primary function (from...

Not really. Their statement makes it clear that WotC's position hasn't changed and emphasizes the word "evolution" for the umpteenth...

I think it will compatible with campaigns and libraries currently on DnDBeyond. And they'll tinker with a few rules for clarification or...

Small iterative changes that are largely compatible with the 2014 rules so that the best selling back catalog of all time remains...

I'm curious as to this ability: "Physical Invulnerability: Superman takes no damage from any effect unless it is generated by a spell...

I would be interested in seeing that number quantified, as in actually putting the rules side by side and see how many have meaningfully...