Corinnguard's latest activity

And then when they appeared in the PF1 menu, they came in several different and distinct flavors.

Bingo. The non-human species in most works of fiction are there because they serve some sort of narrative purpose and I feel as though...

Weapon size constraints make just as much logical sense as attribute limitations...which I freely admit make sense...the question is...

Why is it not an acceptable solution to voluntarily take the lower scores? (I.e., play a Dwarf sorcerer, but put your low...

Yeah 3E absolutely engaged hard with that concept and honestly, I think it found out that it's not terribly productive or entertaining...

So, there's a nice example from a commonly known fiction we can look to: Klingons. At one point (I think it might have been in ST...

According to Wikipedia, there are two different kinds of evil IRL. The first is Moral Evil, which is often the result of a person who...

Also what even is evil in this context - like, if you're really assigning some "biological evil" to a species, what exactly is that...

Well, fetishizing, and attributing superior physical attributes to "less civilized" people, are also forms of racism. I don't think...

I think one of the major things creating issues here is people wanting to have their cake and eat it - i.e. they want a sapient/sentient...

You can have different species. But you can't just say, "it is the same old racist-orc, and we are calling it a species" and get away...

The change from races to species doesn't really change much. You still get the same collection of traits your character was born with...

In theory, perhaps. But, changing the name of the chapter from "races" to "species" doesn't do that in and of itself. You'd have to...

Yeah agree 100%. If CHA is "force of will" as is implied, dwarves surely do not lack that! Honestly I feel like in 6th or 7th edition...

Because no one ever argues that bonuses and penalties should be limited to physical traits, and when you bring in mental traits, it...