CreamCloud0's latest activity

i'd say when their solution relies on or assumes their character knows world information, like the 'trolls are vulnerable to fire'...

i'm not sure i'm getting what you're saying with this here, could you elaborate on your thoughts?

Here is a list of spells levels 0-3, excluding subclass spells. Light Mind Sliver Command Dissonant Whispers Feather Fall...

it's a thought i've had for a good while now that DnD classes suffers from too many of them having exclusive (or near exclusive) claim...

I'm starting to feel like the "Fighters fight" is part of why they don't seem to know what to do with Rangers, beyond making them a sort...

My concern would be that classless and skill tree systems tend to produce much, much less variety, not more, as players converge on a...

If anyone is purely mental, it's all of us here who were hoping for a different resource system for psionics in 5E.

Public playtesting has transformed into a brute force tool. Here's the game. Tell us what you think! It's a lot more subtle than that...

How are you confident that is how the "majority" feel?

Because it wouldn't be an issue if they weren't doing it in the first place.

It does if those ideas don't make sense coming from your character. Would you use out of character knowledge at the table, for example...

If that wasn't a risk, they wouldn't be a smooth-talking player. That's virtually the definition of a player that's charisma higher...

Participating in per se, no. Participating in in a way they might want to? Charisma is the clear poster boy. If you've got a 5...

we've had more than enough threads 'discussing' how some people think it's their right to bypass making CHA checks and speeching...

Theoretically, a low-Wis character who keeps warning the party away from rash decisions could be viewed in "violation" of expectations...