Recent content by Cyclone_Joker

Oh, myyy!!!

Mildly depressing, but since you've not provided a link to official errata, I graciously accept your concession.

"Number of rules sources referenced: zero. Would you like to try again?" You mean "One." So, no, I won't. ... If you honestly can't tell the difference between a published book and Dragon, there's honestly no point in continuing.

So if he said it was official on the forum it would be? Lolno. Chahar Aina and Dastana explicitly stack with a Chain Shirt. An enhancement to armor increases the armor bonus. There you go, you're welcome.

Oh Myyy!

...And? It's precisely as relevant as Mouseferatu's Shadowcasting fix. Which is to say, in a discussion of rules, totally irrelevant unless explicitly stated as being used. Wrong. AC has an enhancement bonus. Armor has an enhancement bonus. An armor bonus does not have an enhancement bonus. The...

Batgirl

Cassandra Cain

Image Comics.

Except that reasoning is blatantly incorrect. Bonuses don't work that way. Furthermore, it's Dragon. I really think that's all that needs to be said, as to taking it seriously. I mean, why not start including 3rd party books or homebrew while you're at it? Plus, with the way it's worded, the...

Wrong. No, they're stacking armor bonuses.[/COLOR] ...And? Those armors are the best, because Chahar Aina are awesome. ...And now we're pretending mithral and armor enhancements aren't a thing? lolokay. A single piece or armor has to have a total of +27 to be comparable to an enchanted mithral...

Bears

Emphasis mine. So, yeah, get a decent roll and you'll know what it is.

No it isn't. It's not text from the book or other similar source. It is not errata The text remains the text. Dead stop, the end, that's it. Wrong. They both give the monk's AC Bonus ability. Untyped bonuses stack, but the same ability does not. So, no. "Strictly speaking," it does not work...

Make a Knowledge(Local) check. The identify check on humanoids are going to be pathetically easy if you even try.