Recent content by Daeger

Isn't the point of a low-magic game to make things a little more mundane? Just give them the bonuses, that's all they really need.

That's just gorgeous. You should apply to be their web designer.

..what? If anything multiclassing left you weak at lower levels. It shined for mid-level play, which is what 3.5 was good at anyhow. Balance issues cropped up at higher levels - but the higher levels in 3.5 were generally an unbalanced mess anyway.

Hate it. It seems more like an afterthought than anything. 3E's multiclassing wasn't perfect, but supplements made it work - granted that 4E supplements might come along and add in more options, but one of the things I was hoping 4th Edition would fix is the reliance on additional products so...

My thoughts exactly. I'm disappointed that if any solution does arise - we're going to have to wait for supplements. I am not satisfied with dabbling. I don't 'dabble' multiclassing. My multiclassed characters are almost always half and half.

Honestly? I don't like this one bit. This is probably the first 4th edition excerpt that has left me completely disappointed. As the article mentions - multiclassing is being introduced as an afterthought. I thought feats for multiclassing were merely going to be one of the many options -...

Definitely 10. Can't wait to start up my campaign. 3.5 is one of those systems I end up devoting way too much time making house rules for. I've tried systems like GURPS and HERO but I think the problem with loose systems like those is that they try to do too much and end up only attributing...

While I think they may do it, they definitely won't on the launch date due to pirates.

I like it.