Recent content by DaemonHunter

What do we still use? Well I allow all the books we have and used before pathfinder, but thats not to say they get used. For the most part my players stick with pathfinder books but will now and again go back to a 3.x book for the odd feat or some such and I'm happy with that.

If you have access to 3ed then theres Wrathful healing in 'Enemies and Allies' +3 enhancement that heals the wielder half the damage that he deals. I think its mentioned on here somewhere in another post as well.

Here we go MINES BIGGER THAN YOURS! forget it guys seems like the only thing people are intrested in is finding ways to break rules and spells to prove they can do stuff. Its a game a roleplay game where what ever you do THE DM ALWAYS HAS THE BIGGEST. Carry on as you like and I'll carry on...

I forgot to say as went onto a bit of a rant LOL I value everyones opinion as much as the last even yours Dandu :p LOL. Its what helps decide things look at all sides and then you can make your own mind up which is right or best for you. My meds must be working as normally when I want...

Its the same thing proof or not he is entitled to his opinion right or wrong. I dont want to get into this more as it will start me on a rant about all the other so called legal/canon builds I have seen on these forums that are anything but legal. As for the gap, hell its a good start using a...

everyones opition is as valid as everyone elses thats why we have freedom of speak. Just because it may differ to yours or anyone elses doesnt mean he is any less entitled to it. We can agree or disagree thats what this is about voicing ones opinions, personnaly I think other classes are...

Ok its not always easy but I did say with little trouble and pathfinder is easy to convert. As with all campaign settings there will always be stuff that doesnt fit like Hi-tech stuff but if your happy to change things somewhat it can be done. The base things most people want to use are as...

Can we stay away from the threats and bigging up please :) everyones view is valid here, if its not then these people wouldnt post and we could be missing out on a great new mind on this forum. I agree it has aways sort of felt like an add-on but then I think its always going to just as 'tome...

I play in 'fprgotten realms' and I have found any of the pathfinder stuff can be converted and used with little trouble. thats why i find pathfinder so great it is easy to use what ever setting you use :)

Thanks guys going great so far, I know I'm newhere so dont know what the history is like but psionics I feel doesnt get thrown around on forums that much. Now before anyone think other wise let me say i have loved psionics since i first played one in 2e. I just think I maybe trying to hold...

Thanks Alzrius now I know what to get :)

Thats my point it doesnt really have the feel for me but then anything else would be just wrong. Anyway so as not to hijack this thread I have started another for your thoughts. feelings and thoughts on Psionics I'm not out to say any of you are wrong, I really would like you thoughts this...

I thought it best to start a new thread about this as i was starting to hijack another thread on psionics and didnt want to do that. You can find the start of this thread here Psionic Books: WotC and Others to see where i am coming from. I would like to know your feelings on psionics in 3.x/PF...

Not wanting to hi-jack but have looked into the malhavoc book Alzrius mentioned and it is n adventure supliment :-S I also found ,if thoughts could kill, and Mindscapes - a Psions guide, this book meantions its a source book written after and covering 'if thoughts could kill'. I am alittle...

I'm not a big fan of XPH (go for it Dando LOL) For me the first was better but only because Xph made psionics just like magic i.e most of the powers IMHO were just spells redone. If thats how you like the idea for psionics fine but I dont I like the 2e its diffrent version, that being said alot...