Recent content by darjr

Have I got something for you! https://www.enworld.org/threads/three-historians-ben-riggs-talks-with-shannon-appelcline-and-jon-peterson.714192/

well it’s about RPGs a subjective pastime almost all the way down. Sorry it’s frustrating. I’m kinda reveling in it. Not just some of the neat stuff this thread has in it but also seeing other people approach the topic in their own way. Strictly correct or not. Any suggestions?

Here’s the OP actual question after some background. Your mileage may vary but that looks like an invitation to talk about the technique inside our outside of DH. The depth of experience with the technique and D&D at this point far eclipses what is DH specific. Why is it that important to you?

Just bumping this.

It’s also about PBTA and other games. I saw the original post about the technique and DH was just the recent illustration.

Thank you for the link.

Now I want to run an extreme Monty Haul campaign just to see what I’d have to do to run it without scheming to remove the haul. I imagine I’d have to get very over the top fast.

A hard line on this seems to contradict “rulings not rules”. can’t like and laugh emoji at the same time!

I knew it! :) I would have added “for a particular style” but if wishes were fishes.

Not all of them.

Sure I see that, but so is extreme optimization. Or an insistence to PVP. Or chaotic behavior. Or siding with the villains against the PCs. Those also could be great parts of the game given the right table.

The thing though is Daggerheart does just fine if you dint do it.

I don’t mind the technique because it doesn’t necessarily break my immersion

I’m kinda jealous.

I think I find this more among GMs. Interesting.