Deekin's latest activity

So I initially ignored 5e, not getting into it until I was talked into public play (this was right around the time the Sword Coast guide...

Yeah, I’m on the same page as you on this matter.

I genuinely sometimes wonder whether WotC is actually designing a game meant to be played by people who will look at the rules and do...

I'd say there's no "seems" about it. It is a wild stance. Bonus actions serve a vital function, just as their predecessors, Minor and...

Because even the existence of bonus actions in 5e was a compromise. Mike Mearls didn’t want them to exist at all, but apparently there...

Not at all. There are enormous swathes of FR that are barely detailed at all, and huge chunks of it can be significantly massaged into...

The DM who I routinely comment on here had a nasty habit of deciding he didn't like specific things after he already okayed them. Not...

Same--or, rather, it would first be met with laughs and (virtual) clap-on-the-back for a ridiculous joke, only to then be met with...

Are you bloody serious? Your players are so gracious, they'll ignore their deep-seated desires just to make sure they never...

The game's been out for 12 years (and the D&D milieu for a lot more). All of us have a ton of character ideas floating around in our...

Don't you take notes during play? Or do you design a 320 page setting Bible first?

Alright, I can see that, but I would consider that a different kind of "inherently objectionable". Namely, objections raised by...

And as a GM, you should want to avoid excluding things that your players truly love but which you personally don't have such strong...

because people tend to be less interested in playing such a role if you define it as such.

How is rejecting someone's ideas without discussion and ejecting them for questioning it not treating that person as disposable?