Deekin's latest activity
-
Deekin reacted to James Gasik's post in the thread D&D General Warlocks' patrons vs. Paladin Oaths and Cleric Deities with
Like.
I'd like to bring up a point- corrupt priests. In a series of fantasy novels I've read, the protagonists belong to one of several... -
Deekin reacted to Maxperson's post in the thread D&D General Warlocks' patrons vs. Paladin Oaths and Cleric Deities with Like.
No idea. None of this is related to any prior edition. This is all about 5e and what 5e says. People incorrectly trying to connect it...
-
Deekin reacted to Neonchameleon's post in the thread D&D General Warlocks' patrons vs. Paladin Oaths and Cleric Deities with Like.
I have actually been known to change players' subclasses on them as a consequence. But I have two hard rules: Not without the consent...
-
Deekin reacted to Remathilis's post in the thread D&D General Warlocks' patrons vs. Paladin Oaths and Cleric Deities with Like.
And it was still a stupid and arbitrary rule that no other class (well except Monk and assassin in a way) did. If there was no openings...
-
Deekin reacted to TwoSix's post in the thread D&D General Warlocks' patrons vs. Paladin Oaths and Cleric Deities with Like.
I don't see a design problem. These issues only seemed to get raised around classes like cleric, paladin, and (now) warlock. I don't...
-
Deekin reacted to Remathilis's post in the thread D&D General Warlocks' patrons vs. Paladin Oaths and Cleric Deities with Like.
I think it's kinda funny that people get worked up about clerics, paladins and warlocks breaking their oaths. Where is the desire for...
-
Deekin reacted to TwoSix's post in the thread D&D General Warlocks' patrons vs. Paladin Oaths and Cleric Deities with Like.
I'm pretty much always OK if the player is on board. The "willfully violate" portion of the text is important, and definitely eases...
-
Deekin reacted to Blue's post in the thread D&D General Warlocks' patrons vs. Paladin Oaths and Cleric Deities with Like.
Yeah, 5e Paladins don't lose their powers for an evil act. However, according to the 5e rules (2013!PHB pg 86, "Breaking Your Oath") we...
-
Deekin reacted to TwoSix's post in the thread D&D General Warlocks' patrons vs. Paladin Oaths and Cleric Deities with Like.
I agree with all of this. The point where we may differ, I believe, is that I don't feel like removing a character's power (like is...
-
Deekin reacted to Neonchameleon's post in the thread D&D General Warlocks' patrons vs. Paladin Oaths and Cleric Deities with Like.
And? But this doesn't change the fact that your claim "they can do that in the fiction" is (a) arbitrary, (b) no longer true, (c)...
-
Deekin reacted to TwoSix's post in the thread D&D General Warlocks' patrons vs. Paladin Oaths and Cleric Deities with Like.
As one of the vehement posters, I would point out that "GM shouldn't limit player choice" and "worldbuilding belongs exclusively to the...
-
Deekin reacted to Neonchameleon's post in the thread D&D General Warlocks' patrons vs. Paladin Oaths and Cleric Deities with Like.
The thing is "Paladins lose their powers for an evil act" hasn't been part of mainline D&D's rules since 2008 and has never been a part...
-
Deekin reacted to Artamo's post in the thread Ryan Dancey & AEG Part Ways Following AI Comments with Like.
“I have zero reason to believe that an Al couldn't come up with Tiny Towns or Flip Seven or Cubitos. I can prompt any of several Als...
-
Deekin reacted to HatWearingFool's post in the thread Ryan Dancey & AEG Part Ways Following AI Comments with Like.
I think anyone that works in software/tech has been in multiple meetings where they were basically told they will be replaced in the not...
-
Deekin reacted to Von Ether's post in the thread Ryan Dancey & AEG Part Ways Following AI Comments with Like.
You can also make a book by piling sentences into it. One of the biggest problem at the moment is not that AI can make things. it is...