DEFCON 1's latest activity
-
DEFCON 1 reacted to Not a Decepticon's post in the thread D&D's Obelisk Plotline Was Supposed to Be Resolved in Vecna: Eve of Ruin with
Like.
I generally prefer to have foundation I can build from, different strokes for different people. -
DEFCON 1 reacted to Not a Decepticon's post in the thread D&D's Obelisk Plotline Was Supposed to Be Resolved in Vecna: Eve of Ruin with Like.
I find it rather easy to fix and improve on published modules and it is usually pretty fun for me. I guess I'm, as they say these days...
-
DEFCON 1 reacted to Not a Decepticon's post in the thread D&D's Obelisk Plotline Was Supposed to Be Resolved in Vecna: Eve of Ruin with Like.
I must admit that, as someone who treats modules as skeletons he puts the meat on and dislikes the "100% ready to run out of the box...
-
DEFCON 1 reacted to TheSword's post in the thread D&D General WotC Continues D&D's Advance To Digital First Brand with Like.
This is the fascinating thing about how expectations shift. We have several hundred out of print products available for a cut price...
-
DEFCON 1 reacted to Scribe's post in the thread D&D General "True Neutral": Bunk or Hogwash with
Haha.
Its a concept that is difficult to discuss on this forum. First, to accept 'True Neutral' or Militant Neutral, we have to accept Good... -
DEFCON 1 replied to the thread D&D 5E (2024) The Problem with Treantmonk's Hunter's Mark.A person could probably write a book on DMs Guild that was nothing but 12 different "Ranger" class write-ups in all different manners...
-
DEFCON 1 reacted to Minigiant's post in the thread D&D 5E (2024) The Problem with Treantmonk's Hunter's Mark with Haha.
Page space. The issue is the ranger everyone would enjoy requires writing every spell and skill effect out The ranger section would...
-
DEFCON 1 replied to the thread D&D 5E (2024) The Problem with Treantmonk's Hunter's Mark.Seems like we have the same story we have had for the last 12 years... Some people do not like the Ranger for their mechanics and spell...
-
DEFCON 1 replied to the thread D&D General WotC Continues D&D's Advance To Digital First Brand.If WotC eventually makes a 6E that they do not print on paper and only releases it on DDB... some enterprising company will just take...
-
DEFCON 1 reacted to pemerton's post in the thread Let's talk about "plot", "story", and "play to find out." with Like.
I've always found it weird that people who enjoyed aspects of AD&D/3E D&D but didn't enjoy 4e D&D regard themselves as having been...
-
DEFCON 1 reacted to hawkeyefan's post in the thread Let's talk about "plot", "story", and "play to find out." with Like.
I don't know what you mean, here. Do I stop to consider the mechanics? Stop what, exactly? I'm playing the game... the game has...
-
DEFCON 1 reacted to Paul Farquhar's post in the thread D&D 5E (2024) Tier 1 Encounters RAW Getting Hit With Cone of Cold 4th Level? with Like.
These are good examples of why trying to mathematicise encounter design is doomed to fail. 45 goblins running at the party down a narrow...
-
DEFCON 1 reacted to Marc17's post in the thread Taylor Navarro Joins Wizards of the Coast as D&D Designer with Like.
Naw, they're least common denominator for the most people. Bling like ribbons and such are for niche market items that need to sell...
-
DEFCON 1 replied to the thread Sunday Chat: What New Editions Were Upgrades? Which Ones Were Downgrades?.I suspect that they all knew that with all the skills, backgrounds, knacks etc. from all the supplements that were not balanced against...
-
DEFCON 1 reacted to Micah Sweet's post in the thread Sunday Chat: What New Editions Were Upgrades? Which Ones Were Downgrades? with Like.
Yeah, I really have no idea what John Wick was thinking with that game. To say nothing of the cluster that Kickstarter turned into.