Dire Bare's latest activity

I'm glad you agree. That's what this video says.

Pretty much only in discussions like this specifically about AI. Not so much in everyday life. What you're describing isn't a news...

Wow. You attacked the reporter's credibility and dismissed his report, despite not watching it... because you didn't like the conclusion...

And did you instantaneously come to your healthy distrust of the reliability of AI content the moment you began using it, or is it...

No, no, no. Read it again. Or watch it again. Or both.

I meant in the moment as it occurred, not in the presented segment.

I mean, he wasn't surprised. He probably didn't even write the script for the segment. He's a presenter presenting content.

I don’t think he was so much surprised by the hallucination so much as the program’s repeated doubling down that it was being factual.

To clean up a podcast transcription? Or to make an informational video about the unreliability of AI? Which decision is questionable...

You did. You attacked the credibility of the journalist (ad hominem). But you know that. And in answer to your question--why would...

Attacking journalists for telling you things you don't want to hear says, in your own words, more about the people who are doing that...

Of course he understood it. He was making an informative video to warn users about the nature of AI outputs. People on the news aren't...

It's not a philosophical question. "Can AI lie?" is just shorthand for "Can AI output false information?" The answer is yes, and...

With respect - you have missed something important. The programmatic action of ChatGPT isn't inherently dangerous. The User...

I'll leave you to attack the journalist. Knock yourself out. I'm here to talk about the AI slop.