Recent content by Dragonstriker

Sneak attack is now once per turn not once per round. Which might make team monster cry.

It seems like some other people in the group don't play well with others. The guy playing the ranger was acting like a jerkass and then to hack on the seer and theif as noobs who can't roleplay is really adding insult to injury. It also sounds like the GM was clueless about running a game for...

Not to be too picky, but I'm pretty sure he meant Sting, who sang that line of Money for Nothing as guest vocalist .

FYI Games Empire just moved over to Castle Hill (Grand opening on Saturday 21st). They also have the D&D books cheaper than Amazon, if you can drive over there.

Why stop 1 square away? Reach doesn't mean "can't be used adjacent" anymore.

I'm thinking about making a (human) paladin who wields a longspear. Is there any reason this is particularly sub-optimal? None of the paladin powers seem to have a weapon line and some of them do push for synergy with spear push. Is there something I'm not seeing? Or a strong synergy with some...

Tell me again because I missed your explanation - why are you using a wizard whose role is to damage and inflict conditions on multiple enemies over large areas in your examples, since you appear to dismiss the fact that the damage is spread over multiple enemies as meaningless*? Wouldn't it be...

Ok, but that isn't making an OA against an arbitrary non-adjacent enemy - it's making an OA against an enemy moving to become adjacent and who will become an adjacent enemy with CA vs you (or a dead non-adjacent enemy). Anyway, this is a corner case for whether shifting provokes in general as...

No, Polearm Gamble means you can make an OA when a non-adjacent enemy enters a square adjacent to you - if they are just shifting or moving to another non-adjacent square, you're out of luck.

It's simple really - the higher INT guy gets inside the OODA loop of his opponent. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OODA_Loop

You didn't read the thread did you? Hit, Miss and Effect ARE clearly explained, but the OP is wilfully misinterpreting; I repeat my assertion they are either a troll, or can't comprehend english. You know, I get that you're a 4e hater, but don't use the inability of some posters to read as a...

I was making a general point to avoid singling out individual posters, but read http://www.enworld.org/forum/showthread.php?t=234064 and then tell me it's the designer's vague rules causing the problem.

I agree, however in the type of thread that prompted this one this is clearly not the issue, simply poster's failure (or wilful refusal) to understand english. (For illustration, see threads on milestones, vorpal weapons, cloud of daggers, ad nauseum) I agree again and this was the type of...

And well I know it. Don't worry, I don't intend to be offensive. I was trying to be sincere when I said we'd all be better off. And i'm glad I'm not the only one this bothers.

Tks. I appreciate your good wishes. I'm afraid it's gonna hurt.