Recent content by Dragox27

More or less, yes. But I do feel the additional information is important because of the context of this conversation is around a video dealing with the same topic. As mentioned in my initial post about the video I'd typically be more generous but there were a lot of demonstrable lies that he...

Please refer to the third paragraph of my post. If tech makes something worse it's not absolved by virtue of something being bad in the first place. It generates new images and presents that as the frame for the user. The input it uses to generate those images is the colour data (i.e the 2D...

I can only agree. The entire video is either based on a faulty understanding of the tech or is deliberately duplicitous in its explanation. It seems a lot closer to the latter. The framing of this "debunking" as DLSS5 not altering existing geometry is a smokescreen and nothing else. This isn't a...

After all, people weren't stuffposting about it en masse with yassified edits because they thought it looked great and merely enhanced the natural features of the characters in question. Mod Edit: language

I read your post. You posted the Aloy image made as an example of what women in games "should" look like because the creator of said image felt she was far too masculine. As was the explicit stated intent of its creation. If you don't like what that says about your argument pick more thoughtful...

I can't really believe anyone would use and overtly and deliberately sexist example as a defence of this tech and expect it to come off well meaning. It's a fairly poor choice on tone alone. Not to imply that anyone is being sexist as I can't speak to that but the comparison between these things...

I've read what you said and stand by my statements.

That's not "fact-based". Lots of people are pale and perfectly healthy in every sense. It's just as much conjecture on your part meaning that you're only word policing for language you find favourable. Given there is no functional or meaningful distinction between those descriptions in this...

As if on cue. No. It's obviously not like saying someone is wearing makeup because their lips are rosy. It's like saying changing someone's lips to be rosy when they don't have rosy lips is like what makeup does. We're not talking about a before image in isolation, we're talking about the after...

I think it's very telling the primary defence of this has amounted to variations on disingenuous wordplay or outright denial of demonstrable facts.

It's a screenshot of the video. It is, in fact, what that character looks like in real time because it's from a video demonstrating what they look like in real time. I didn't photoshop that. I watched the video, in real time, saw the problem and then took a screenshot to demonstrate it. Your...

And we can all thank God for that. I genuinely don't see how anyone could view this as an improvement. It can't even track the models face accurately. It's failing at one of the most basic hurdles of rendering motion. It's not even managing blinking with warping eyes into major medical...