ECMO3's latest activity

That is not it, it is more like I am not going to do this because I said I wasn't going to do it in session 0, we will change it in the...

Telling you which to use doesn't address the point you were replying to, which is about rules traps. Things of the same name but...

I don't know I am a pretty experienced DM and so are many of the DMs I play with and those who switched to 2024 are using that...

No that is not true, usually it was done with a bonus action or haste or action surge or they had an aura up (before an aura was...

That is not the only time they said it. I agree that the context was using the 2024 rules. I think he is simply explaining how to do...

Sure, you can do anything you want in your game.

All I am doing is telling people how WOTC said backwards compatibility is supposed to work, I've used that method in my games and it...

No you haven't. You have been told that the stuff that ISN'T yet updated should work with the new material. So you have to RTFM to know...

Yes we were told that, at least twice in interviews with JC and one of their other guys and to be clear the message was they are...

Provided they are not more than one size larger, are not over their carrying capacity and the person carrying has a free hand. That...

That still would not fix it to like it was. It is not about disengaging next to or within reach of the guy with Sentinel, and whether...

We were told repeatedly by WOTC that if something is reprinted/changed you should only use the new reprinted version. I realize that...

I don't understand what you are saying. Sentinel no longer lets you attack enemies who take the disengage action except when they take...

It is not just reach weapons. Even if I am holding a reach weapon, someone can disengage from 30 feet away and walk right by you...

I don't know. I think it is unfair to bend RAW to suit one player and to make that decision in the middle of a campaign.