Emerikol's latest activity

But what is the point? The DM is still going to rule. Even if a snake specialist says such and such snake can't climb down a rope, I'm...

The problem with this approach is that armor or weapon requiring more than a 14 str would never arise. There just aren't enough people...

Really? There is nothing a DM cannot rule against or overrule. Yes a spelled out rule means it is more likely to work consistently...

Sure but really the recourse as players is just leave that campaign because if the DM is that clueless it is wrong then I'm not sure...

It would make sense if it was a stance they could switch at will. A stance indicates the fighter is trying to setup whatever the weapon...

It kind of goes along with the idea, "What the DM says goes, and if the DM says enough stupid stuff, the players go"

A Martial "switching" something on a daily basis is why I don't play 5e. My group would never get past that moment.

This is kind of where our group is at I think. We moved back to D&D from Pathfinder in 2014, partly because Pathfinder had become so...

I don't believe you have to be an expert in the way you are saying. The only kinds of games I enjoy are well designed and well thought...

Yeah. The mechanics only tell you the result. It's completely up to the GM--completely, totally, absolutely arbitrary--what that result...

Obviously it would depend on how blatant it was, right? That a snake climbed down a rope would likely not draw much attention. It also...

This is certainly true in a traditional D&D campaign.

Just to chime in here on this entirely new topic... The idea of suspension of disbelief is that some baseline exists. It doesn't mean...

This works for the prime material plane but still doesn't explain how they get to the prime material plane.

I think a single game should not try to please everyone. Too many people want to play rules as written and blindly follow them wherever...