Enrahim's latest activity

I see other people have already pointed this out, so I apologise if this feels like dogpiling, but this is misrepresenting what...

But, but - what about that menachled halfling child? :O ;)

you could easily say the opposite is RAW since they don't mention it. It's up to the DM to allow you to re-try.

I have never made any such claims. Anyone using belivability and realism as synonyms are using the words differently than me. I am not...

I didn't. The context was a reply to a forum thread, where I happened to talk about this particular procedure.

Which game doesn't matter, as long as it doesn't bind the GM to do otherwise. In which case, refer to your game rules. Edit: "Well...

Of course we don't need to go trough this rigmarole. That just happens to be a way many find produces a more believable experience than...

But time/noise do have a mechanism for being handled. That is what the random encounter roll is for! If the ruleset specifies the time...

The complaint was that the cook only existed depending on some event. Much like light is quantum and in the double slit experiment* and...

The cook only exists because of a failed roll that has no diegetic reason. I'm not going to argue about it any more. It's pointless...

What some trad DMs, to eliminate their own bias, is assign odds and then roll a die to see if the cook is in the kitchen or wherever...

There is “no difference” between a buffet, a menu, and a set menu. All rely on a chef deciding what to cook. (note, some games are more...

You may have something there (none of us are perfect), but the books used to refer to "cops & robbers" for stuff like that. Referring to...

Fail forward isn't a mechanic to be codified, simply a technique than can be employed (or not) as one sees fit. Granted, any given game...