Enrahim's latest activity

It kind of goes along with the idea, "What the DM says goes, and if the DM says enough stupid stuff, the players go"

In a similar vein, this thread has helped me with a casual project I've been working on, which has been to see how far player authorship...

Appreciate the compliment. It expands on my Blackmarsh setting and puts a spotlight on traditional adventure sites—while also using...

Obliquely, I think the three or so types of fact play a part in justifying the "expert-GM" of FKR. We have Type-I facts - things true...

I don't have much to say to the rest of your post, but this stood out. This is the school I belong to. You might (or might not) have...

This is interesting. We indeed have very common backgrounds. I absolutely see your point. It actually in a way strikes me as more...

The climbing snake example is interesting because apparently many readers, lacking much knowledge of snakes, just accepted Doyle's...

FKR advocates have setup a boogie man of rigid mechanics to strike down, assuming a given event must be resolved either entirely through...

If you recognize that the argument is boiling down to preferences, that's fine.

I am driven by curiosity tough (witch killed the cat). I really would like to see the arguments against the FK concept, as I know I have...

The amateur-player hypotesis could be used as an possible explenaton for either of the FK hypoteses if true as they modulate the...

Well, there would be wisdom in considering whether there should be a dispute in that case. "I don't actually know this way is superior...

Absolutely. I didn't realise before it was to late I painted myself into one of the corners. My intention was really to point out that I...

Thank you! Just to preempt some possible bad words. I think the hard FK hypothesis "is solid". I now realize that is a poor choice of...

Fully agreed. And this is one of the reasons it is hard to get traction on resolving this dispute.