EzekielRaiden's latest activity

I listened to a reading of D&D allowed, and Ben Riggs had Jonathan Tweet on it. In 3e, it felt like spellcasters were given supremacy...

Ok. so, if "when" is non-exclusive, then it includes being killed. Thus, the rule for not dealing lethal damage applies. You can't...

So....4e mechanics, but with better presentation? I feel like you've dismissed this exact same proposal multiple times before...so it's...

4e did it. Even if you don't like the result, it proves that it can be done without this alleged "off the charts" effort.

But that literally was not the argument being made: This is not "every single NPC (of a certain type) uses X, therefore my character...

Sure, but IMO much more to the point, they gave a specific breakdown of exactly why they did so--and it is pretty much the same...

So instead....they listened to....people who heard about the "D&D Next" playtest....on forums...? Your argument doesn't make any sense.

I have no idea how I multi-quoted, my apologies. @EzekielRaiden , @Reynard

I assume this got cut off. If we are admitting this though, we are talking about a situation where there are concessions to...

As if they are even remotely the primary driver here. That blame belongs to me, and a couple of others.

I have, yes. Have you considered that it wasn't possible for them to know that? That they were taking the most reasonable path forward...

Well see, now you're making a completely different argument. It's not "if an NPC can do it, I can too." It's now "if every NPC can do...

No idea. I can only report the facts as they occurred. This is what happened. The designers listened to fan criticism before release...

Nnnnnope. Because that is, as stated, all of them hand-making their own thing. Inspiring others is not what a playtest document is for...

Well then, let me tell you the tale of Darth Wyvern the Golden. 4e was originally going to have a lot more flavor and setting...