Faolyn's latest activity

Fantasy world, @mamba . Fantasy.

I always feel that there were always multiple paths to combat power, but the designers/fandoms desire to only support 1-3 warrior...

I think that's a holdover from when you were supposed to sink all that money into training and/or your own personal fortress.

Sure, but if you can snipe a sparrow dead with a longbow from 100 yards then who is more powerful? Or think of it like Goku and Babidi...

I bet you can. Especially if you go back to individual/small group weapon proficiencies instead blanket proficiency with every weapon...

Because it lets you do things you couldn't otherwise do, duh. That's how magic works in tons and tons of fantasy settings. Being able to...

Define powerful. Are we just talking damage? Because I bet you could make really interesting casters that have few or no direct-damage...

I mean, if we're talking fantastical, the idea that a Fighter can in well under six seconds (from level 5 onwards) potentially kill or...

This would work. I still haven't had the opportunity to play Daggerheart, but I really, really want to. And I really like the way they...

Yikes! Using the word "destroyed" seems a little much in this case. Maybe something like "overcome" or "defeated" would've been better.

I knew someone who refused to use spells that did acid damage because of having seen pictures of women who'd been subjected to acid...

And the function of a fireball is to cause slaughter en masse, burning people to death. In the real world, we've come to generally agree...

Yes, well, as I said, I've only sort of tangentially followed the discussion. But, don't they discuss their discomfort in terms of...

Yeah and worth noting this sort of thing would probably be an actual limited ability, not just at will distance chops unless that was...

Not in 5E, no they could not. That's just incorrect. A 5E Fighter has full proficiency in all armour, shields, and martial weapons...