FitzTheRuke's latest activity

I meant people back on earth in the past. Not, say, someone with you on whatever vessel you took to get in there.

Why not? As long as you don’t cross back over that event horizon, why can’t you wander round and talk to people? (I mean aside from the...

So In an attempt to create a visually-astounding black hole, Kip Thorne (producer, and theoretical physicist) used the most accurate...

Yes, I get that it is a different thing - I just didn't remember which part was relevant to the film, and I'm not sure it mattered which...

I watched a version of Gravity with commentary by astronaut women, and it was humorous to see their comments such as Sandra Bullock not...

Team Lake Bjorn watched as the scrawny lizardfolk struggled to get free of the growing number of crazed predatory fish that had...

If you say so. I don't find it plausible at all. "We don't know what happens" isn't really the same thing as "We can totally make up...

Hmmmm...that comment made me search my brain for hard sci-fi movies that are still very entertaining. And I didn't have to search too...

IDK, but does it matter? We all agree that you aren't likely to wind up consciously able to control space-time so you can return to your...

How dare you claim I can't revivify a corpse via some chemically induced process!

By "they" I mean the people that made, and the people that have reviewed the move. Not ALL of them, I'm sure, just the general talk...

There's a long running debate about what makes a good science fiction story. For some, the science must be accurate otherwise you have...

It's not really a big problem though. The important thing about Frankenstein isn't that you can't revivify a corpse via some chemically...

Yes, and you could make a case for that making you "inside a black hole", I suppose, but I'm referring to the part where all of your...