Flights of Fancy's latest activity
-
Flights of Fancy replied to the thread D&D General Ad Hoc, Rail Road, Sandbox?.I don't DM often--ever really. But as a player I love a good railroad. That might sound strange but when I play D&D I am there to take... -
Flights of Fancy reacted to Guest 85555's post in the thread D&D General [rant]The conservatism of D&D fans is exhausting. with
Like.
I can't even get into that stuff. I used to watch Anime when I was younger, but I find I can't really get into animated stuff these days -
Flights of Fancy replied to the thread D&D 5E Convince me that the Ranger is a necessary Class..Well, you change half-casters to get level 5 spells at 9th level just like casters. Instead of slowing down their progression, you...
-
Flights of Fancy replied to the thread D&D 5E Convince me that the Ranger is a necessary Class..No, for me it is because those ranger variants aren't a "ranger" for me. Plenty of content, just not appealing to me. I think the...
-
Flights of Fancy replied to the thread D&D 5E Convince me that the Ranger is a necessary Class..I don't think that's a blockade at all. Lose some artwork and you have space, or add 4 more pages. I don't see why you think there is a...
-
Flights of Fancy replied to the thread D&D 5E Convince me that the Ranger is a necessary Class..Well, I think it is fine for them come here and complain, but then yeah they should expect some others to tell them it's not likely WotC...
-
Flights of Fancy replied to the thread D&D 5E Convince me that the Ranger is a necessary Class..LOL, maybe yours do! ;) No. I actually find these not flavorful as spells. Nothing wrong with them, just not what I would call...
-
Flights of Fancy replied to the thread D&D 5E Convince me that the Ranger is a necessary Class..Some people have. Like I said, I've played in homebrews where Barbarians were a Fighter subclass, and so on. My belief is that, because...
-
Flights of Fancy replied to the thread D&D 5E Convince me that the Ranger is a necessary Class..And the fact you think any of that isn't Tier 3 is the other 50% of the problem. ;) For instance, your "planar" assumption might be...
-
Flights of Fancy replied to the thread D&D 5E Convince me that the Ranger is a necessary Class..Just using the core four in the PHB doesn't work, though*. The other classes have to become part of them in some fashion. For example...
-
Flights of Fancy reacted to Minigiant's post in the thread D&D 5E Convince me that the Ranger is a necessary Class. with
Haha.
That's because in Tier 3, the base game transitions to planar play. Wilderness survival can and should get more dangerous options as... -
Flights of Fancy reacted to Shades of Eternity's post in the thread D&D 5E Convince me that the Ranger is a necessary Class. with Like.
I miss 4e's role niches It made it easier to determine what you needed for your party and allowed everybody to be special. I liked some...
-
Flights of Fancy replied to the thread D&D 5E Convince me that the Ranger is a necessary Class..Works for me! But what exactly is "Eldritch" for spells as opposed to arcane, divine, or primal?
-
Flights of Fancy reacted to Paul Farquhar's post in the thread D&D 5E Convince me that the Ranger is a necessary Class. with Like.
I think calling it something different, without all the contradictory baggage, would be the be the way to go. “Warden” seems like a...
-
Flights of Fancy replied to the thread D&D 5E Convince me that the Ranger is a necessary Class..I was more talking about the character creation process, sorry for any confusion. Yep, and it is why I like the Sidekicks in 5E...