Flying Toaster's latest activity
-
Flying Toaster reacted to Ralif Redhammer's post in the thread D&D General "True Neutral": Bunk or Hogwash with
Like.
I think true Neutral only works when you take alignment as the cosmic forces of Moorcock and Anderson, not as personality guides. When... -
Flying Toaster reacted to TwoSix's post in the thread D&D General "True Neutral": Bunk or Hogwash with Like.
Militant Neutrality generally boils down to the Omelas problem, or a question of utilitarian ethics. In pursuit of a greater good...
-
Flying Toaster reacted to Artamo's post in the thread D&D General "True Neutral": Bunk or Hogwash with Like.
When I’ve considered Mordenkainen’s neutrality stance, I’ve never really thought it got down to the level of kingdoms and politics. It...
-
Flying Toaster reacted to MichaelSomething's post in the thread D&D General "True Neutral": Bunk or Hogwash with
Haha.
I think Futurama says it best... -
Flying Toaster reacted to Professor Murder's post in the thread D&D General "True Neutral": Bunk or Hogwash with Like.
As I state initially, saying "Unchecked Good can lead to Tyranny" is a facile argument because by definition when that happens it is no...
-
Flying Toaster reacted to Professor Murder's post in the thread D&D General "True Neutral": Bunk or Hogwash with Like.
I will regret this, but meh. So are there actual lore examples of "True Neutral" NPCs and their actions that have any justification for...
-
Flying Toaster reacted to Whizbang Dustyboots's post in the thread D&D's Obelisk Plotline Was Supposed to Be Resolved in Vecna: Eve of Ruin with Haha.
Isn't Tharizdun's goal "ooh, I enjoy naps in lesser Gary Gygax dungeons?" Or did 4E put a lot more meat on his bones?
-
Flying Toaster reacted to Marc17's post in the thread D&D's Obelisk Plotline Was Supposed to Be Resolved in Vecna: Eve of Ruin with Like.
I think what I would like to see would have been a book with adventure(s) based on people finding and using the hand and eye of Vecna...
-
Flying Toaster reacted to Whizbang Dustyboots's post in the thread D&D's Obelisk Plotline Was Supposed to Be Resolved in Vecna: Eve of Ruin with Like.
That's also a big part of the Adventure Time ethos. They take standard tropes and then just go crazy with it. (Very few other fantasy...
-
Flying Toaster reacted to SkidAce's post in the thread D&D's Obelisk Plotline Was Supposed to Be Resolved in Vecna: Eve of Ruin with Haha.
I see you fell for Vecna's (is that even really his name?) lies and propaganda...muhahahahahaha!
-
Flying Toaster replied to the thread D&D's Obelisk Plotline Was Supposed to Be Resolved in Vecna: Eve of Ruin.The Lich from Adventure Time is an interesting case of a villain who is both generic and specific. He does not even have a real name of...
-
Flying Toaster reacted to Marc17's post in the thread D&D's Obelisk Plotline Was Supposed to Be Resolved in Vecna: Eve of Ruin with Like.
I'm old fashioned. Vecna's personality will always be the corrupted personality of whatever fool attaches his hand, eye, or both.
-
Flying Toaster reacted to Seramus's post in the thread D&D's Obelisk Plotline Was Supposed to Be Resolved in Vecna: Eve of Ruin with Like.
Yep! And slightly before 4E (2007) there was an article that described his Hall of Secrets, which is a place where dark practitioners...
-
Flying Toaster reacted to Paul Farquhar's post in the thread D&D's Obelisk Plotline Was Supposed to Be Resolved in Vecna: Eve of Ruin with Like.
Whilst being on TV helps, you can also give a character a personality through writing. But Gygax didn’t write Vecna because he was...
-
Flying Toaster reacted to Whizbang Dustyboots's post in the thread D&D's Obelisk Plotline Was Supposed to Be Resolved in Vecna: Eve of Ruin with Like.
"I'm undead, a powerful wizard and I'm weirdly into the tombcore aesthetic for my home." The fact that you can almost certainly swap...