FrogReaver's latest activity

The issue isn’t with forward-facing causality it’s with the idea of a simultaneous 6 seconds being able to be handled sequentially.

Then maybe you should play it more :)

This is one of those oh-so-very-rare instances where I find myself agreeing with @pemerton. The way WotC-era initiative works is very...

If we went back, then if A kills B, B would still have a turn. That doesn't happen. I didn't say it was a good system, I said I...

Well, relatively long turn based combat. Once you start getting to relatively short time frames and account for reaction time and the...

Combat in d&d is an exception to the normal game loop and the combat loop is well known to produce implausible results. It’s a strong...

You're talking about The Forge as if the definitions they used still have great significance that we all agree on. We don't. People...

Right--and because you're avoiding nonsensical results, jumping back in time to gather herbs impose constraints. You can't have anything...

Where are you getting that? If A kills B, B does not suddenly pop back to life to get a chance to kill A first. Admittedly rounds and...

Curious on how you feel about critical fumbles? Whether that’s driven by GM narrates bad outcome on a 1 or GM rolls on table when a 1...

That would be all of them in this thread. Suppose the level 1 party goes to the local adventuring guild looking for jobs. While there...

I think there's alot of nuance there, such that painting most people into the box of only wanting forward facing causality isn't...

Exactly. The initial claim paraphrased 'too many coincidences makes something as a whole implausible'. An excerpt about one individual...

That is wrong. In one case you have a player declaring that they'd like their character to find herbs. In the other you have a player...

I don't see "forcing people" to do what everyone already does at an amusement park as forcing them. We already decide yes or no to...