FrogReaver's latest activity

No. He doesn't agree with you.

Because it creates different incentives. Given how you supposedly are well-versed in game theory, it is rather surprising how blind you...

Maybe they claimed the same causal relationship as me, just not as eloquently put as you managed to describe it?

No, we all understand that the character didn't cause that. In fact, that is the cornerstone of the whole objection! That the player...

This is an exelent expansion of what I mean when I wrote "a causal relationship between character hope and meaning of runes". I said...

In actor stance the actor doesn’t impact fiction outside his character other than what his characters actions could fictionally cause...

yes the question is how, whether in character actions do so or via direct authoring. Your conclusion that the character has good...

IMO Everyone grasps what you are doing. They just explain it differently. That is its different conclusions on the same set of facts.

@Enrahim I view imaginary things and player ideas of imaginary things as the same exact thing. Do you? I think that’s been a major...

Wait, you are quibbling over, the players idea of an imaginary thing vs the imaginary thing being the cause? To me the word imaginary...

Let me finish the part sentence you half quoted. Why did you feel like saying the same as me with so many more words?

I don’t think you answered @maxperson’s question here at all. Posting the skill doesn’t define what if any limitations it has from your...

If imaginary things don’t have real causal relations then how can one prompt a real player to author what the runes are?

How is the epistemic state in terms of the posibility regarding the posibility of the runes revealing something positive that isn't a...

Which can't possibly be the case if I-as-player am able to affect the fiction beyond what my character can know about, as seems to be...