FrogReaver's latest activity

The effectiveness of the player is how much he decreases the party effectiveness with only him having 1 less mod…. Changing the rest...

Missing 1 mod is now equivalent to paralyzed? I still don’t understand why you don’t just run the proper test through your simulator.

It wasn't an example meant to be used, as was clear from the context. I was simply showing that percentages don't mean a whole heck of...

That’s everything. That’s what your entire claim was and what the whole disagreement is all about. In actual play having your PC not be...

Strictly speaking my claim wasn’t that you’ll win 100% of the time either way so it doesn’t matter. There’s obviously some effect. The...

IMO totally unrealistic examples don’t show anything except that in totally non-realistic circumstances it could do something.

Why you wasting time on an example that cant actually show what you want to show?

Explain this? Why is pointing out that players are overwhelmingly favored to win 5e combat mean that rules and math don’t matter?

Single player isn’t how d&d is played either. It must be 1 PC in the group context to match with your point. If it’s really that...

Not when most combats have you winning 99% of the time. Having a better stat mod might up that to 99.5%.

Which won’t prove your claim that 1 mod is that important… It’s more realistic perhaps, but doesn’t align with your claim.

The test needs to be set up fairly and properly to demonstrate your point. I think that kind of proves my point…

I think you are using two different measures of effectiveness.

Do you see how all my what ifs are true, and they can happen? And they could happen more often to the fighter with the higher strength...

Oh god. That’s not how that works at all. Statistical significance is about testing a hypothesis and finding that there’s only a 5%...