FrogReaver's latest activity

You keep repeating this, but I never once put it through AI. I happened to agree with AI on that point only because that was my...

It went completely over my head lol.

I agree she's not explicitly calling for new laws, but it's pretty clear where her sympathies lie. In any event, I think the very fact...

That's fair. I assumed that, and possibly it was justified at the time given the intense pushback we got for sharing our perspectives...

Article is pretty clear on it's purpose. "The purpose of this Article is to explore the notion of literary property, to determine...

The whole paper, as far as I can tell...I admit I'm kind of glazing over...is basically an argument for what she thinks the law should...

I'm not surprised. My point isn't whether it's hidden in a footnote or note, it's the footnote explains the full context and while on...

Thanks for the tacit admission that you didn't read the article either. I read a decent portion as well and I didn't consult AI on it's...

This is the quote in question "The full extent to which literary property can be said to safeguard an author’s natural right over his...

I have serious doubts you read the whole article.

I didn't ask the AI on this one, but i'm in agreement, footnote 4 seems fairly damning to the articles basic premise.

IMO. Democracy isn’t a natural right. Thus no voting is either. But I think this will quickly stray a bit too far into politics so I’m...

In my case, the point is to highlight my belief that we're talking about artificial rights introduced to deal with changing...

Your race to an extreme parody of what the other poster claimed suggests that you don't really have a good response.

Right. The whole point is that establishment of any particular non-perpetual timeframe undermines the natural/moral right theory for...