Horwath's latest activity

with having mandatory Conc spell baked into class from 1st level, that would be a welcomed change. For starters. HM does not really need...

that is Con save in 5E.

another use for that is why you lower the damage output and keep skill bonuses.

1: drop favored enemy 2: add Hunter's focus As a bonus action you can focus on one target you can see or hear, you gain advantage on...

no damage on Conc for HM needs to be from lvl1, level of losing the Conc tag from HM can be debated, but no later than lvl7, so maybe...

I just don't get why Hunter's Mark has become so central to the concept of Ranger. I see a lot of concepts about "fixing" ranger that...

I just played D&D with friends who I have not played with in 25 years. It was over the inter webs, it was only for two hours, we had but...

again fail at design, what it promotes? 100% shillelagh build, as any other will under perform. reliable, but low damage dealer this...

problem is that to use HM most, you need to be in melee with TWF, and you lose Conc as soon as someone sneezes at you, especially at T2...

ranger is probably the best class at 1st level, that I agree and it's only downhill from there.

Probably, ranger can be salvaged from this by simply adding at 5th level that you can cast HM without Conc and duration reduced to...

agree. I have nothing against HM spell by itself, it's a mediocre spell that can be utilized good if you can manage some extra attacks...

what WotC needed to to is not backtrack on universal subclass level and they needed to make every class have the same "power budget" for...

haha, another ranger subclass that relies 100% on Hunter's Mark... why am I not surprised? just delete every spell from ranger class...

time sink can easily be eliminated by DM telling what AC of the monsters are. then you can have your own table on your sheet. if you...