Horwath's latest activity

problem is that for last "forever" years, everyone and their mothers has own opinion on what ranger should be. so this is a solution to...

you can have both, have classes as suggested pre selected feats, and let "advanced" players pick and choose. as for Uber/unter combos...

tireless and nature's veil needs to be decouple from wisdom, just have them be used 5/Long rest by defaul.

every class is a feat tree, just you dont have a say what it is in that tree, it'a, here is a log for you, go play with it. also, there...

maybe not, but it would still be better than "take it or leave it" features that are here now, especially the all beloved HM and all...

it can be, but it would be little trouble balancing it, but base way would be similar to warlock invocations. call it ranger talents...

I would avoid giving anything new to super high levels, almost no one plays them, maybe I would even remove new subclass feature at...

I think that EVERY ranger wants to sneak up on the target rather than engage then directly, but ranger is atleast better equipped to...

Scout while it has somewhat flavor of the ranger is pretty meh as a subclass and rogue is pretty weak as a class, little better in 2024...

yes. 5E is basically, 80% of characters have 14 CON, 19% have combinations of 12 or 16 and 1% is everything else just delete the stat...

Hot takes on stat spread for classes: 1) Constitution shouldn't be an ability score we bother with because it's too central to every...

I dont like them much either, it's cool idea, but their spells come online too little too late. So I like any version of spell-less...

I don't mind HM being in rangers arsenal for those who want to use it. it's an OK spell. I would like to delete all Ranger features...