Horwath's latest activity

i hate hunters mark in all it's forms as a damage oriented spell, no matter how many buffs and class perks they try to assign to it...

right now features force players to use HM always, may rework just require ANY ranger Conc spell, including HM if you really like it...

also, you can use similar solution that other classes/subclasses use for concentration spells. Shorter duration: When you cast HM, you...

or how to not make ranger boring HM class, rework Favored enemy to work with all or most Ranger! spells. 1st level: you get additional...

it's not missing the point. missing the design point is making high level features depend on (not really good) 1st level spell. even...

The problem with hunters Mark is it should not be a spell in the first place. It should be a class feature that you can use a number of...

it's not a backup spell if later class features and subclass features spend "class points" on using HM. you either have HM on 24/7 or...

maybe 3rd level so everyone can poach it(heh) as a one level dip.

I really like the idea of a ranger casting Hunter’s Mark through a target’s tracks, and I agree 5th level would be fine. Frankly, I...

it should not be in limited use then. Here is a rework: Call it Ranger's Focus: once on your turn as a Bonus action or as a part of...

17th level is simply too little to late for a feature that adds +1d6 damage to an attack. paladins get +1d8 to every attack, no limited...

I like the idea of casting HM through tracks, but why level 13? it's really a ribbon feature then. 5th level would also be fine. It...

This is very similar to what I do with my players. Level 5 casting Hunter's Mark using Favored Enemy doesn't require concentration...

I agree that Conc removing tied with spell level is a bad idea. And I agree that it needs to be ranger's class ability, but not a high...

I play it simple: extra attack is part of the action that triggered the attack, unless it is specifically stated otherwise. So Cleave...