Hussar's latest activity

Which is the point I keep harping on. That might be a definition that you are using, but, that definition is WRONG. That's not what...

I totally agree. The fact that people completely ignore the fact that D&D in no way supports any "simulation-like" activity because at...

Because it clearly was an "errata". They didnt have the distribution technology to effectively distribute otherwise at that point in...

Oh my god. RTFM The fourteen modules that make up the Dragonlance saga are meant to be one adventure, same as if you had bought a WotC...

Sigh. This conversation would be so much better if people would actually simply have the common courtesy to accept that some of us know...

Not even a little. That is not pure sim at all. Because, now, you're not simulating anything, you're actually doing it. Lacking any...

Like I said earlier, we're not really having a conversation in this thread most of the time because there is such a lack of common...

A few auxiliary rules and and systems leaned into simulation to some degree. They kind of stood out in that regard for pretty much the...

It's nothing to do with whether or not I like it. Sequentiality is not an abstraction of simultaneity. It's an alternative to it...

Oh please. TSR-era D&D was about as far from simulation as you could get. It was pure wargame. Good grief, your character can't even...

It’s possible to read “simulation” from the inkblot that is modern D&D. But it’s an interpretation, at most.

If a player nitpicks at a GM over things that don't really matter, I'm calling shenanigans.

That's fair. I wrote those examples in a bit of a hurry and flubbed that one up. Shall we say a sandstorm instead? :p

Why was the cook there? Because it was uncertain whether or not the cook might be there. When there's uncertainty, the DM sets a...

Not necessarily. The character might have fallen because magical pixies made him trip. He might have fallen because the rock face...