Hussar's latest activity

It's in the SECTION YOU QUOTED!

Because the d20 roll is undefined. The largest part of the check is 100% undefined and, if it was defined, in any way, then it would...

Umm, you missed the part where "and narratively interesting" has been added. Which I pointed out earlier. It is a pretty significant...

And that's where we part ways. If all simulation means is being able to post hoc justify a result, then the term is meaningless. So...

I'd point out though that that's not the issue. No one, especially not me, has had any problems with the mechanics giving you results...

And here we have exactly what I was talking about. The players can either accept the DM's narration or they can leave the game...

Fair enough. But, just to be clear, while I have used "Pixies" as the go to example, it's not really meant to be exactly that. My...

In MHRP, Trapdoor to Sigil would be an asset, with a die rating. It is no more or less powerful, mechanically, than any other asset. I...

White Plume Mountain. Castle Amber. Against the Slave Lords. In all these modules, and as far as I know in the modules that WotC is...

The problem is, the only judge of the narrative is the players and the players are told never to contradict the DM because challenging...

Then we're missing steps. Perhaps whatever the "simulation" (probably the wrong term, but we're stuck here) thing is we're taking about...

This, to me, is a MUCH more interesting conversation and gets to the heart of things. Because, from where I'm standing, it almost looks...

Well then, I consider that objection pretty seriously problematic, if retrocausality is totally unacceptable from one participant and...

The DM can put in whatever he wants so long as he doesn't disrupt the game. It's a subtle but very important distinction. So long as...

Yes, but this only works if you interpret the d20 roll to only mean skill. We are not going to agree on that. That's just not going to...