Hussar's latest activity

I reflected on the thread topic overnight, and thought I'd write more about it. First, I think that this topic (character backgrounds)...

So, great. You agree with me. Swords were not dominant in the past. Some people used them and some people used something else. D&D...

Look, all I can say is, don't stick to that one lone article. There's a MOUNTAIN of stuff there that you've barely scratched in order...

Yes and no though. Let's not forget that a lot of spells last more than one round. If you cast a summoning, you got critters for the...

And yet, there are zero complaints about the Battlemaster doing exactly the same thing. Or the Mastermind Rogue. We have a Trickery...

Honestly, this has always struck me as being a little weird. If I ask a melee character's player if they'd like to make another attack...

Barbarians wield greataxes. The Warlord wields Barbarians.

While Warlord healing is consistent with what Gygax says about hit points in the AD&D DMG, since most of the ways to regain hit points...

I get that. I mean, to a large extent I actually agree, despite being all in in playing 5e. I miss the days when you would see maybe...

And, frankly, this is the answer to why Battlemasters aren't quite there yet. Battlemasters focus too much on dealing damage directly...

Yes everyone does, which is why I question the desire for more non-casting classes.

I have for Warlord Battle Captain (Intelligence based Buffer) Combat Veteran (Wisdom based Tank) Knight Commander (Charisma based...

Warlords are specifically non-magical. That's the entire point. It's only "magical" if you take the presumption that HP=meat...

Oh, that I would disagree with. The Warlord just has so many potential subclasses. I mean, good grief, 4e had what, six different...

I still refer to backpacks as "the invisible leather TARDIS"