Recent content by I'm A Banana

I don't think the "fireball yourself" is even an option in '24, and that is likely specifically due to that particular result sometimes being a bummer. I think it's fine to not have subclasses that might accidentally kill the party (even if it is a real low chance to do that -- you'd have to...

I do not think it is a very niche taste. I have seen multiple wild sorcerers played in different groups without issue. Rather, I think randomness appeals to one of the reasons why people enjoy TTRPGs, and control and decision-making, both being mentally exhausting activities, are part of why...

Seems like they designed the randomness to not swing too dramatically in 5e, judging by the lack of people I've seen generally complaining about the modern wild mage (which is to say, maybe single digits, over the course of 10 years). You don't think so?

She's an amazing designer, her adventures are top-notch and Godsbreath is such a compelling setting (and I really dig the gothic horror vibe). Wins.

I'm digging the 3rd Party Era of D&D Beyond. Very cool.

When I play a wild mage, frustrating or anticlimactic results are part of the fun. If I wanted control, I'd write a novel (or, at least, NOT play an archetype that revels in lack of control).

I played a binder in 3e and really enjoyed it. Flavor is my cup of tea, and the character I played was a changeling who would shift form to resemble the various vestiges she was binding (her name was Rasa, as in "Tabula Rasa"). The fiction for the vestiges was very, very good. Great role playing...

Big 3 Likes: Actually thinking about game design. D&D was designed by vibes for a long time before anyone thought about the impact those mechanics would have in play. Starting at about 3e, the people at the helm started thinking more about how to actually use the rules at the table, and it's...

I liked a lot of 13th Age's ideas. Some felt a little too "immersion breaking" for me, since I am pretty strong Actor Stance in my D&D, but they were cooking. Escalating power was also a good idea. But, yeah, I think the "wizard problem" is mostly solved if you move the high-level play into an...

I have seen: Dodge action Disengage action Using actions to use potions (2014 rules) Using actions to cast healing spells PC's investing in heavier armor Which I'm pretty happy with. I don't necessarily need dedicated "defensive powers" a la 4e's utility powers. There's room for a more...

The biggest impact at my table has been in hitting PC's so hard that if they DON'T choose to spend some resources on defense, they WILL be dealing with downed characters. Focus fire, use several monsters, and my groups, at least, have responded. No one wants to deal with a downed character.

The conflict is mostly for WotC's designers: do you include the moral conflict angle in your new version of Dark Sun or not? Core D&D is pretty explicit that it's only interested in non-Evil characters. The idea of a Dark Side-style "temptation" isn't really a conflict that standard D&D is...

These two things are in tension with each other. If Dark Sun is really about embodying a heroic character who doesn't do the Clearly Evil Villain Stuff, then we don't need player-facing rules for defiling. PC's are exceptional, every PC spellcaster is a preserver, because defiling is Clearly...

Bogeyman. The Fun Police aren't coming for your game, and this doesn't change the fact that WotC's design choices do set expectations for millions of tables. "Weak" or not, the expectation set by that language is very clear. The Fun Police aren't coming for your game, and the rules encourage...

My copy says this: If that logic extends to Dark Sun, it would be consistent if they just excluded defilers and slave-built Bastions as PC options and left defilers and slavers you could fight, but none you could play as. Dark Sun without PC defiling isn't the same thing as Dark Sun without...