James Gasik's latest activity
-
James Gasik replied to the thread What Are Your Favourite Movie Quotes?."Now, you Irish cops are perking up. That's two sound theories in one day, neither of which deal with abnormally sized men. Kind of... -
James Gasik reacted to W'rkncacnter's post in the thread D&D General D&D Evolutions You Like and Dislike [+] with
Haha.
"Oh no, the warlord is giving me the opportunity to be a more effective character by using an ability that requires a willing target... -
James Gasik reacted to nevin's post in the thread D&D General D&D Evolutions You Like and Dislike [+] with
Like.
Actually I just ignore attunement. I think it was just a solution in search of a problem. -
James Gasik reacted to soviet's post in the thread D&D General D&D Evolutions You Like and Dislike [+] with Haha.
Did the defenders never make attack rolls because they weren't strikers?
-
James Gasik reacted to Yaarel's post in the thread D&D General D&D Evolutions You Like and Dislike [+] with
Wow.
Part of the 4e design philosophy appears to be to create rules that no longer require a DM to adjudicate ambiguity or narrative context... -
James Gasik reacted to Alzrius's post in the thread D&D General D&D Evolutions You Like and Dislike [+] with Like.
It's funny that you mention that. I was at Gen Con in 2007 when 4E was announced, and in the seminar where they said that there wouldn't...
-
James Gasik reacted to TwoSix's post in the thread The D&D 4th edition Rennaissaince: A look into the history of the edition, its flaws and its merits with Like.
Honest question. Disguise self is a spell castable by Wizards, Sorcerers, Bards, Artificers, and Trickery Domain Clerics. Despite...
-
James Gasik reacted to EzekielRaiden's post in the thread The D&D 4th edition Rennaissaince: A look into the history of the edition, its flaws and its merits with Like.
The problem is, that's not what Bob is saying here. Instead, it is: Bob: "4th edition had many good points, but also some bad points."...
-
James Gasik reacted to Nightfly's post in the thread The D&D 4th edition Rennaissaince: A look into the history of the edition, its flaws and its merits with Wow.
What is it about 4e that makes people take everything so personally? BOB: 4th edition had many good points, but also some bad points...
-
James Gasik reacted to Jacob Lewis's post in the thread The D&D 4th edition Rennaissaince: A look into the history of the edition, its flaws and its merits with Like.
I guess it bears repeating what I've said before: I yearn for the day when everyone can stop fixating on 4e as being the "failed"...
-
James Gasik reacted to TheSword's post in the thread The D&D 4th edition Rennaissaince: A look into the history of the edition, its flaws and its merits with Wow.
Matey, I played the beta, it came out well over a year before release. We were playing Pathfinder off a full pdf of the rules in Aug...
-
James Gasik reacted to Staffan's post in the thread The D&D 4th edition Rennaissaince: A look into the history of the edition, its flaws and its merits with Like.
I don't think anyone can say with a straight face that 4e wasn't a failure, for a variety of reasons (I mean, a game with those sales...
-
James Gasik reacted to EzekielRaiden's post in the thread The D&D 4th edition Rennaissaince: A look into the history of the edition, its flaws and its merits with
Sad.
It's still pretty wrong. Like, believe me, I would love for it to be right! Because that would mean 4e never had any period where it... -
James Gasik reacted to W'rkncacnter's post in the thread D&D General D&D Evolutions You Like and Dislike [+] with Like.
+ascending AC. i don't know how you all dealt with thac0 before. +save consolidation (and transformation into nads) +unified proficiency...
-
James Gasik reacted to TwoSix's post in the thread D&D General D&D Evolutions You Like and Dislike [+] with
Love.
I'm talking about the 1989 PHB, the one with the fighter charging with the orange-y background. I don't have it handy, but I remember...