James Gasik's latest activity

This is what Mike Mearls said about them on YTube.

Because even the existence of bonus actions in 5e was a compromise. Mike Mearls didn’t want them to exist at all, but apparently there...

Given how overloaded some characters are with bonus actions anymore, it's crazy that they weren't intended to be ubiquitous.

I think its just a "simplification" in some form, to keep it simple there is no rule for action conversion and everything costs exactly...

Note: this applies to 2014 and Tales of the Valiant as well. For a long time, I've wondered as to the exact reasons why you cannot...

When I started to play 4e, my entry point was the public play program, D&D Encounters and later Living Forgotten Realms. Because of...

“Jim let me read the script “

I am pretty sure that the convolutedness of the classes is wanted / by design. (Rulebook organization most likely not, this happens...

So I decided to take a look at my level 5 Oracle from PF 1e. I have the following notations on my sheet due to racial, feats, traits...

He was the only one who hadn't read the script!

"Now, you Irish cops are perking up. That's two sound theories in one day, neither of which deal with abnormally sized men. Kind of...

"Oh no, the warlord is giving me the opportunity to be a more effective character by using an ability that requires a willing target...

Actually I just ignore attunement. I think it was just a solution in search of a problem.

Did the defenders never make attack rolls because they weren't strikers?

Part of the 4e design philosophy appears to be to create rules that no longer require a DM to adjudicate ambiguity or narrative context...