Jfdlsjfd's latest activity

I think, or at least a family of implementations quite similar to it (Claude, Grok...): general purpose LLMs, marketed by companies to...

Then maybe the use of "AI" is inappropriate when the target is (I suppose) ChatGPT?

I am not ignoring that fact. Never in this thread have we limited our reasoning to the context of the United States. I think that...

LexisNexis and Dalloz are two reputable editors of legal text databases. I don't know their internal operation, but I guess they trained...

I can't explain why you took issue, you'd be the best person to identify why you did take issue? The point was that: 1. We notice that...

Technically, when you sign up, you end-up being exposed to a wall of text. Including this: https://openai.com/policies/usage-policies/...

I have no problem making the manufacturer liable using regular, common means of making it liable. The idea that was discussed was...

I do, and, much like the First Amendment and the definition of free speech and the limitations of it, it's something country-specific...

How would you call it other than a tool? (real question, there is absolutely no sarcasm). It's a piece of software.

Saws are risky. Risk mitigation is taken. In the wider context, we already have laws preventing people for sawing off other people. We...

We started from the situation where AI is giving bad legal advice, accompanied with warning on its faillibility and recommandation to...

It is a tool. But if we make a law preventing bad advice to be given on the basis that we need to protect people from bad advice, and AI...

Indeed. We're discussing AI technology, and I wanted to point out that it doesn't need to be accessed through a website by a commercial...

Maybe. Maybe we should be happy with a result and the accompanying warning to consult a professional and not rely on it for anything...

Or the non-corporate Chinese entity that published for free the AI software that you run on your own computer in the case of, say, Deepseek.