Jfdlsjfd's latest activity
-
JJfdlsjfd reacted to Ryujin's post in the thread Judge decides case based on AI-hallucinated case law with
Haha.
Purely anecdotal, so not provided as evidence of anything, but without prompting of any sort I was prescribed Penicillin for Chicken... -
JJfdlsjfd replied to the thread Judge decides case based on AI-hallucinated case law.Not sure. Overprescription of antibiotics also exist in countries where top customers would go to jail instead. Though the rise of this...
-
JJfdlsjfd replied to the thread Judge decides case based on AI-hallucinated case law.I am slightly more pessimistic. I think the population prioritize environmental concern that don't affect them. Say, with numbers used...
-
JJfdlsjfd reacted to The Firebird's post in the thread Judge decides case based on AI-hallucinated case law with
Like.
I think you are conflating "unpopular with those in the industry" with "those in the general public". Most people don't know or care... -
JJfdlsjfd replied to the thread Judge decides case based on AI-hallucinated case law.I wish I were as optimistic. I think you regain public trust when the generation that knew about not wearing seatbelt has passed away...
-
JJfdlsjfd reacted to Dannyalcatraz's post in the thread Judge decides case based on AI-hallucinated case law with Like.
A legislator’s job is to make hard decisions, whether or not it’s popular. ESPECIALLY when it’s unpopular but the best option. Despite...
-
JJfdlsjfd reacted to The Firebird's post in the thread Judge decides case based on AI-hallucinated case law with Like.
No. But we vote for legislators. Your argument seems to me "it is not a concern if the underlying arguments for regulations are...
-
JJfdlsjfd replied to the thread Judge decides case based on AI-hallucinated case law.I don't think (but maybe it's possible/will be possible) for a chatbot to differentiate between the two. You can lie to the chatbot and...
-
JJfdlsjfd reacted to Dannyalcatraz's post in the thread Judge decides case based on AI-hallucinated case law with Like.
The problem is, people ARE trusting general purpose LLMs to make diagnoses or suggest dangerous self-help actions. We’ve seen that with...
-
JJfdlsjfd reacted to Mustrum_Ridcully's post in the thread Judge decides case based on AI-hallucinated case law with Like.
An interesting aspect of seat belt laws is also: It forces every car manufacturer to have them. If it wasn't a law that you needed them...
-
JJfdlsjfd reacted to The Firebird's post in the thread Judge decides case based on AI-hallucinated case law with Like.
I'd guess the rates are very different for unsupervised use, at the moment. And the LLM errors are more egregious than what lawyers...
-
JJfdlsjfd replied to the thread Judge decides case based on AI-hallucinated case law.As long as enough don't, we're golden. The glue on pizza and taste-testing mushrooms are the exploding pressure-cookers of decade pasts...
-
JJfdlsjfd replied to the thread Judge decides case based on AI-hallucinated case law.Given the number of times people got to get back to the doctor because they didn't get treated the first time, which is a common memory...
-
JJfdlsjfd reacted to Gorgon Zee's post in the thread Judge decides case based on AI-hallucinated case law with Like.
That's not quite as clear as you might think. There have been a few studies that show comparable or better accuracy from LLMs. Lots of...
-
JJfdlsjfd reacted to The Firebird's post in the thread Judge decides case based on AI-hallucinated case law with Like.
But regulations are not statements of fact. They weigh many competing concerns, like whether they violate any rights and how to balance...