-
NOW LIVE! Into the Woods--new character species, eerie monsters, and haunting villains to populate the woodlands of your D&D games.
Lazybones's latest activity
-
Lazybones replied to the thread D&D (2024) Line of sight ruling.I would not allow the options you suggested (closing your eyes or looking away) as solutions. I read "can't" as "unable to," not the... -
Lazybones replied to the thread D&D (2024) Line of sight ruling.Line of sight is defined on p.45 of the DMG; the wording there has nothing to do with whether the target can see and has more to do with...
-
Lazybones reacted to Snarf Zagyg's post in the thread D&D General When We Were Wizards: Review of the Completed Podcast! with
Like.
I did go over the Buck Rogers thing before. See Part C. But arguing Buck Williams is a fool's errand. It was neither unlawful nor... -
Lazybones replied to the thread D&D (2024) What upcoming WotC D&D product are you excited about?.I don't really have a need for a starter set right now, but I have been intrigued by how the previews have looked and might end up...
-
Lazybones reacted to DEFCON 1's post in the thread D&D 5E I feel like the surveys gaslit WotC about """"Backwards Compatibility"""" with Like.
Coming out of nowhere doesn't really mean anything. After all... Weapon Mastery and Cunning Strike both "came out of nowhere" and were...
-
Lazybones reacted to billd91's post in the thread D&D 5E I feel like the surveys gaslit WotC about """"Backwards Compatibility"""" with Like.
I think there's substantial backward compatibility and I think it was a worthwhile goal. I'm currently running two games with 2024 rules...
-
Lazybones reacted to Chaltab's post in the thread D&D 5E I feel like the surveys gaslit WotC about """"Backwards Compatibility"""" with Like.
I think the biggest thing is that they wanted to maintain compatiblitly with 3rd party content, especially subclasses. When you change...
-
Lazybones replied to the thread D&D General [rant]The conservatism of D&D fans is exhausting..I like to make my games as sandboxy as possible (in terms of giving players freedom to make decisions beyond the default storyline I've...
-
Lazybones replied to the thread D&D 5E I feel like the surveys gaslit WotC about """"Backwards Compatibility"""".One of my groups is playing 2024 characters in a mod I created using the 2014 rules. Haven't had to do much except bump up the...
-
Lazybones reacted to Jfdlsjfd's post in the thread WotC Would you buy WotC products produced or enhanced with AI? with Like.
Maybe not here, simply. What makes them feel look alike is that basically, some people are opposing it on political grounds ("it's bad...
-
Lazybones replied to the thread WotC Would you buy WotC products produced or enhanced with AI?.Just chiming in to say thanks to The Firebird for posting that link; it looks like an amazing resource and I've already grabbed a few...
-
Lazybones reacted to el-remmen's post in the thread D&D General [rant]The conservatism of D&D fans is exhausting. with Like.
This thread is like a Greatest Hits of every ENWorld argument ever all at the same time! :ROFLMAO:
-
Lazybones replied to the thread D&D Errata Nerfs Conjuring Spells, Makes Other Changes.The change to the conjure spells was identical to my house rule, so I'm glad to see that. Also glad that they clarified that temp HP...
-
Lazybones replied to the thread D&D (2024) What are your 2024 houserules?.Here is my list from my current 2024 campaign. We're also keeping the flanking rule and the optional diagonal movement rule. Most of...
-
Lazybones replied to the thread D&D (2024) Anyone else dislike the "keyword" style language of 5.24?.Others have provided more examples, including in the post directly above yours. I have no problem with people who prefer to lean more on...