Recent content by Lucan_Desmond

I do believe you're right. Like I said, I've never really used point buy. You are correct again, that was a mistake. You could be right, I don't know how you want to play. All I know is that when I had to play the party burden once... I didn't enjoy it. Everything I said was either "Cleric...

I'd say the character jumped off a cliff and died... can I re-roll NOW? Seriously though, if the rest of the party doesn't have crappy stats like this, then you're not going to have fun no matter what class/race you play. You're just gonna be a burden on the rest of the party. If you're DM...

My first character had really high stats too. Not this high, but high. If I used the point buy system, I think he was a 42 point buy. Give or take a couple points. Of course the rules were different back in 1e, but thats what he would have been if I had created him in 3e. Anyway, I would never...

Heh, Warlock Monk... can anyone say DBZ character? :p

I still feel that there is nothing wrong with the current multi-classing. If you're a caster and you start taking levels in a non caster class, then you're gaining the benefits of that class. So if that class can take care of itself (and every class can take care of itself) Then when you combine...

Well thank you for the comment, and if you find some of those varient threads, please give me a link. The only thing about the alignment though, you have a quote from the "Description" section of the class in the book. Go down a few lines into the "Game Rule Information" section, it actually...

In youe OP you said that you wanted multi-classing make the character more versatile, but less powerful. I'm pretty sure this is going against that. I'll just grab one line from the above post... Ftr8/Wiz12 = CL16 Thats MORE powerful than if you just used the normal rules for multiclassing...

Wow thanks! I guess I can see the comparison with the Archon. Glowing balls of pure energy. I was thinking that this class could be very multi-purpose when I was creating some parts of it. For example, if you take the Melee Bolts feat you can use the arcane bolts in melee without penalties...

So I just want some opinions really. Preferrably nice ones. I created the class in my sig, The Arcane Shaper, about a year ago. I finally posted it on the internet here and on the WotC forums a few months back. And just today, July 10th, I saw Complete Arcane and the Warlock for the very first...

Warlock no good! So I FINALLY got Complete Arcane today. I know I must be the last person in the world to get this book. And I've been told that this class I've created is akin to the Warlock on a few levels. So arcane bolts is similar to eldritch blast. Except it's more powerful. And I left...

The rules clearly state that you cannot crit undead. So you were right and your player was wrong. I however would allow the crit with this spell. This is because undead are animated corpses that are given false life through a connection to the negative energy plane. Since Disrput Undead is not...

I agree that the ELH was handled very poorly. In fact, I would go as far as to say the WotC staight up dropped the ball on that one. It's a useless book. Mainly because it's just full of numbers. Nothing interesting. And above all, nothing that denotes that it's for a role-playing game. As for...

Oh I also forgot to mention again that if anyone wants the word doc. of this class all they need to do is email me at naducard@hotmail.com I'd be more than happy to send you this ASAP! Thank you for your support! Lucan Desmond

OOOOOOOHHHHHHHHHHHH....... That explains it. Well thanks for letting me in on that little piece of info, I never knew. Wow. Well anyway, thanks for letting me know, and I hope everyone here can enjoy my class again. Later, Des

I used to have this up here on these boards a few months ago, but while I was moving my account apparently got deleted, and so did all my posts. It's changed a bit, but it's about as done as I think it can get. If you disagree, please tell me why you think that way! The Arcane Shaper “Duvo...